Efficacy of three COVID-19 vaccine doses in lung transplant recipients: a multicentre cohort study. Issue 1 (19th January 2023)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Efficacy of three COVID-19 vaccine doses in lung transplant recipients: a multicentre cohort study. Issue 1 (19th January 2023)
- Main Title:
- Efficacy of three COVID-19 vaccine doses in lung transplant recipients: a multicentre cohort study
- Authors:
- Dauriat, Gaëlle
Beaumont, Laurence
Luong Nguyen, Liem Binh
Renaud Picard, Benjamin
Penhouet, Morgane
Coiffard, Benjamin
Salpin, Mathilde
Demant, Xavier
Saint Raymond, Christel
Carlier, Nicolas
Messika, Jonathan
Reynaud Gaubert, Martine
Danner, Isabelle
Gallais, Floriane
Roux, Antoine
Le Pavec, Jérôme - Abstract:
- Question addressed by the study: Do three coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine doses induce a serological response in lung transplant recipients? Methods: We retrospectively included 1071 adults (551 (52%) males) at nine transplant centres in France. Each had received three COVID-19 vaccine doses in 2021, after lung transplantation. An anti-spike protein IgG response, defined as a titre >264 BAU·mL −1 after the third dose (median (interquartile range (IQR)) 3.0 (1.7–4.1) months), was the primary outcome and adverse events were the secondary outcomes. Median (IQR) age at the first vaccine dose was 54 (40–63) years and median (IQR) time from transplantation to the first dose was 64 (30–110) months. Results: Median (IQR) follow-up after the first dose was 8.3 (6.7–9.3) months. A vaccine response developed in 173 (16%) patients. Factors independently associated with a response were younger age at vaccination, longer time from transplantation to vaccination and absence of corticosteroid or mycophenolate therapy. After vaccination, 51 (5%) patients (47 non-responders (47/898 (5%)) and four (4/173 (2%)) responders) experienced COVID-19, at a median (IQR) of 6.6 (5.1–7.3) months after the third dose. No responders had severe COVID-19 compared with 15 non-responders, including six who died of the disease. Conclusions: Few lung transplant recipients achieved a serological response to three COVID-19 vaccine doses, indicating a need for other protective measures. Older age andQuestion addressed by the study: Do three coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine doses induce a serological response in lung transplant recipients? Methods: We retrospectively included 1071 adults (551 (52%) males) at nine transplant centres in France. Each had received three COVID-19 vaccine doses in 2021, after lung transplantation. An anti-spike protein IgG response, defined as a titre >264 BAU·mL −1 after the third dose (median (interquartile range (IQR)) 3.0 (1.7–4.1) months), was the primary outcome and adverse events were the secondary outcomes. Median (IQR) age at the first vaccine dose was 54 (40–63) years and median (IQR) time from transplantation to the first dose was 64 (30–110) months. Results: Median (IQR) follow-up after the first dose was 8.3 (6.7–9.3) months. A vaccine response developed in 173 (16%) patients. Factors independently associated with a response were younger age at vaccination, longer time from transplantation to vaccination and absence of corticosteroid or mycophenolate therapy. After vaccination, 51 (5%) patients (47 non-responders (47/898 (5%)) and four (4/173 (2%)) responders) experienced COVID-19, at a median (IQR) of 6.6 (5.1–7.3) months after the third dose. No responders had severe COVID-19 compared with 15 non-responders, including six who died of the disease. Conclusions: Few lung transplant recipients achieved a serological response to three COVID-19 vaccine doses, indicating a need for other protective measures. Older age and use of mycophenolate or corticosteroids were associated with absence of a response. The low incidence of COVID-19 might reflect vaccine protection via cellular immunity and/or good adherence to shielding measures. Three mRNA COVID-19 vaccine doses rarely induced a serological response in lung transplant patients. COVID-19 was rare, suggesting cellular immunity and/or strong adherence to shielding measures. Other protective methods should be sought. https://bit.ly/3pr9Wox … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- European respiratory journal. Volume 61:Issue 1(2023)
- Journal:
- European respiratory journal
- Issue:
- Volume 61:Issue 1(2023)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 61, Issue 1 (2023)
- Year:
- 2023
- Volume:
- 61
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2023-0061-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2023-01-19
- Subjects:
- Respiratory organs -- Diseases -- Periodicals
Respiration -- Periodicals
616.2 - Journal URLs:
- http://erj.ersjournals.com ↗
http://www.ersnet.org ↗
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/member/institutions/issuelist.asp?journal=mrj ↗
http://www.ingenta.com/journals/browse/ers/erj?mode=direct ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1183/13993003.00502-2022 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0903-1936
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 26764.xml