Appropriateness of Computed Tomography Scanning in the Diagnosis of Craniosynostosis. Issue 1 (January 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Appropriateness of Computed Tomography Scanning in the Diagnosis of Craniosynostosis. Issue 1 (January 2022)
- Main Title:
- Appropriateness of Computed Tomography Scanning in the Diagnosis of Craniosynostosis
- Authors:
- Margulies, Ilana G.
Graziano, Francis
Goel, Pedram
Xu, Hope
Bui, Anthony H.
Brown, Stav
Sanati-Mehrizy, Paymon
Morgenstern, Peter F.
Urata, Mark M.
Taub, Peter J. - Abstract:
- Abstract : Introduction: Although physicians from a variety of specialties encounter infants with possible craniosynostosis, judicious use of computed tomography (CT) imaging is important to avoid unnecessary radiation exposure and healthcare expense. The present study seeks to determine whether differences in specialty of ordering physician affects frequency of resulting diagnostic confirmations requiring operative intervention. Methods: Radiology databases from 2 institutions were queried for CT reports or indications that included "craniosynostosis" or "plagiocephaly." Patient demographics, specialty of ordering physician, confirmed diagnosis, and operative interventions were recorded. Cost analysis was performed using the fixed unit cost for a head CT to calculate the expense before 1 study led to operative intervention. Results: Three hundred eighty-two patients were included. 184 (48.2%) CT scans were ordered by craniofacial surgeons, 71 (18.6%) were ordered by neurosurgeons, and 127 (33.3%) were ordered by pediatricians. One hundred four (27.2%) patients received a diagnosis of craniosynostosis requiring operative intervention. Craniofacial surgeons and neurosurgeons were more likely than pediatricians to order CT scans that resulted in a diagnosis of craniosynostosis requiring operative intervention ( P < 0.001), with no difference between craniofacial surgeons and neurosurgeons ( P = 1.0). The estimated cost of obtaining an impact CT scan when ordered byAbstract : Introduction: Although physicians from a variety of specialties encounter infants with possible craniosynostosis, judicious use of computed tomography (CT) imaging is important to avoid unnecessary radiation exposure and healthcare expense. The present study seeks to determine whether differences in specialty of ordering physician affects frequency of resulting diagnostic confirmations requiring operative intervention. Methods: Radiology databases from 2 institutions were queried for CT reports or indications that included "craniosynostosis" or "plagiocephaly." Patient demographics, specialty of ordering physician, confirmed diagnosis, and operative interventions were recorded. Cost analysis was performed using the fixed unit cost for a head CT to calculate the expense before 1 study led to operative intervention. Results: Three hundred eighty-two patients were included. 184 (48.2%) CT scans were ordered by craniofacial surgeons, 71 (18.6%) were ordered by neurosurgeons, and 127 (33.3%) were ordered by pediatricians. One hundred four (27.2%) patients received a diagnosis of craniosynostosis requiring operative intervention. Craniofacial surgeons and neurosurgeons were more likely than pediatricians to order CT scans that resulted in a diagnosis of craniosynostosis requiring operative intervention ( P < 0.001), with no difference between craniofacial surgeons and neurosurgeons ( P = 1.0). The estimated cost of obtaining an impact CT scan when ordered by neurosurgeons or craniofacial surgeons as compared to pediatricians was $2369.69 versus $13, 493.75. Conclusions: Clinicians who more frequently encounter craniosynostosis (craniofacial and neurosurgeons) had a higher likelihood of ordering CT images that resulted in a diagnosis of craniosynostosis requiring operative intervention. This study should prompt multi-disciplinary interventions aimed at improving evaluation of pretest probability before CT imaging. Abstract : Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of craniofacial surgery. Volume 33:Issue 1(2022)
- Journal:
- Journal of craniofacial surgery
- Issue:
- Volume 33:Issue 1(2022)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 33, Issue 1 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 33
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0033-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2022-01
- Subjects:
- Cost-effectiveness -- craniofacial surgery -- craniosynostosis -- CT -- neurosurgery -- radiation
Facial bones -- Surgery -- Periodicals
Skull -- Surgery -- Periodicals
Face -- Surgery -- Periodicals
Surgery, Plastic -- Periodicals
617.52 - Journal URLs:
- http://gateway.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&MODE=ovid&PAGE=toc&D=ovft&AN=00001665-000000000-00000 ↗
http://www.jcraniofacialsurgery.com ↗
http://journals.lww.com/jcraniofacialsurgery/pages/default.aspx ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1097/SCS.0000000000007928 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1049-2275
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4965.476000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 26753.xml