Development of a machine learning model using electrocardiogram signals to improve acute pulmonary embolism screening. Issue 1 (25th November 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Somani, Sulaiman S; Honarvar, Hossein; Narula, Sukrit; Landi, Isotta; Lee, Shawn; Khachatoorian, Yeraz; Rehmani, Arsalan; Kim, Andrew; De Freitas, Jessica K; Teng, Shelly; Jaladanki, Suraj; Kumar, Arvind; Russak, Adam; Zhao, Shan P; Freeman, Robert; Levin, Matthew A; Nadkarni, Girish N; Kagen, Alexander C; Argulian, Edgar; Glicksberg, Benjamin S
• Is Part Of: European heart journal. Volume 3:Issue 1(2022)
• Page Start: 56
• Page End: 66
• Publication Date: 2021-11-25
• Subjects: Pulmonary embolism -- Electrocardiogram -- Machine learning -- Deep learning; Medical informatics -- Periodicals; Medical technology -- Periodicals; Cardiovascular system -- Periodicals; 616.100284
• DOI: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztab101
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2634-3916

Abstract

Abstract: Aims: Clinical scoring systems for pulmonary embolism (PE) screening have low specificity and contribute to computed tomography pulmonary angiogram (CTPA) overuse. We assessed whether deep learning models using an existing and routinely collected data modality, electrocardiogram (ECG) waveforms, can increase specificity for PE detection. Methods and results: We create a retrospective cohort of 21 183 patients at moderate- to high suspicion of PE and associate 23 793 CTPAs (10.0% PE-positive) with 320 746 ECGs and encounter-level clinical data (demographics, comorbidities, vital signs, and labs). We develop three machine learning models to predict PE likelihood: an ECG model using only ECG waveform data, an EHR model using tabular clinical data, and a Fusion model integrating clinical data and an embedded representation of the ECG waveform. We find that a Fusion model [area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUROC) 0.81 ± 0.01] outperforms both the ECG model (AUROC 0.59 ± 0.01) and EHR model (AUROC 0.65 ± 0.01). On a sample of 100 patients from the test set, the Fusion model also achieves greater specificity (0.18) and performance (AUROC 0.84 ± 0.01) than four commonly evaluated clinical scores: Wells' Criteria, Revised Geneva Score, Pulmonary Embolism Rule-Out Criteria, and 4-Level Pulmonary Embolism Clinical Probability Score (AUROC 0.50–0.58, specificity 0.00–0.05). The model is superior to these scores on feature sensitivity analyses (AUROC 0.66–0.84) and achieves comparable performance across sex (AUROC 0.81) and racial/ethnic (AUROC 0.77–0.84) subgroups. Conclusion: Synergistic deep learning of ECG waveforms with traditional clinical variables can increase the specificity of PE detection in patients at least at moderate suspicion for PE. Graphical abstract: