Magnification‐driven B‐spline interpolation for cone‐beam projection and backprojection. Issue 10 (20th September 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Savanier, Marion; Riddell, Cyril; Trousset, Yves; Chouzenoux, Emilie; Pesquet, Jean‐Christophe
• Is Part Of: Medical physics. Volume 48:Issue 10(2021)
• Page Start: 6339
• Page End: 6361
• Publication Date: 2021-09-20
• Subjects: backprojection -- B‐splines -- Cone Beam CT -- homography -- magnification‐driven interpolation -- projection; Medical physics -- Periodicals; Medical physics; Geneeskunde; Natuurkunde; Toepassingen; Biophysics; Periodicals; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 610.153
• DOI: 10.1002/mp.15179
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0094-2405

Abstract

Abstract: Purpose: Discretizing tomographic forward and backward operations is a crucial step in the design of model‐based reconstruction algorithms. Standard projectors rely on linear interpolation, whose adjoint introduces discretization errors during backprojection. More advanced techniques are obtained through geometric footprint models that may present a high computational cost and an inner logic that is not suitable for implementation on massively parallel computing architectures. In this work, we take a fresh look at the discretization of resampling transforms and focus on the issue of magnification‐induced local sampling variations by introducing a new magnification‐driven interpolation approach for tomography. Methods: Starting from the existing literature on spline interpolation for magnification purposes, we provide a mathematical formulation for discretizing a one‐dimensional homography. We then extend our approach to two‐dimensional representations in order to account for the geometry of cone‐beam computed tomography with a flat panel detector. Our new method relies on the decomposition of signals onto a space generated by nonuniform B‐splines so as to capture the spatially varying magnification that locally affects sampling. We propose various degrees of approximations for a rapid implementation of the proposed approach. Our framework allows us to define a novel family of projector/backprojector pairs parameterized by the order of the employed B‐splines. The state‐of‐the‐art distance‐driven interpolation appears to fit into this family thus providing new insight and computational layout for this scheme. The question of data resampling at the detector level is handled and integrated with reconstruction in a single framework. Results: Results on both synthetic data and real data using a quality assurance phantom, were performed to validate our approach. We show experimentally that our approximate implementations are associated with reduced complexity while achieving a near‐optimal performance. In contrast with linear interpolation, B‐splines guarantee full usage of all data samples, and thus the X‐ray dose, leading to more uniform noise properties. In addition, higher‐order B‐splines allow analytical and iterative reconstruction to reach higher resolution. These benefits appear more significant when downsampling frames acquired by X‐ray flat‐panel detectors with small pixels. Conclusions: Magnification‐driven B‐spline interpolation is shown to provide high‐accuracy projection operators with good‐quality adjoints for iterative reconstruction. It equally applies to backprojection for analytical reconstruction and detector data downsampling.