214 Reconstruction of AUS Cuff Erosion: Defect Size Predicts Prognosis. Issue 1 (1st April 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- 214 Reconstruction of AUS Cuff Erosion: Defect Size Predicts Prognosis. Issue 1 (1st April 2022)
- Main Title:
- 214 Reconstruction of AUS Cuff Erosion: Defect Size Predicts Prognosis
- Authors:
- Chertack, N
Nealon, S
Joice, G
Caldwell, K
Kavoussi, M
Dropkin, B
Ortiz, N
Baumgarten, A
Shakir, N
Sanders, S
Hudak, S
Morey, A - Abstract:
- ABSTRACT: Introduction: In-situ urethroplasty (ISU) has been proposed in conjunction with device explant as an acute management strategy after artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) cuff erosion. Previous studies have not shown a clear relationship between extent of erosion and long-term prognosis. Objective: We hypothesize that more extensive erosions are associated with higher rates of lower urinary tract complications (LUTC) and increased need for urinary diversion (UD). Methods: We performed a retrospective study of patients who underwent ISU for AUS cuff erosion from June 2007 to December 2020 with a minimum of 90-day follow up. Patients were stratified into two groups based on the degree of urethral erosion determined endoscopically at the time of device explant - mild erosions (<33% circumferential defect) and major erosions (> 33%). Outcomes included LUTC, AUS reimplantation, and UD. LUTC was defined as urethral strictures, diverticulum, fistulas, and erosions of a secondary AUS. UD was defined as suprapubic tube placement with or without urethral ligation or ileal conduit creation. Kaplan-Meier curves were created to compare outcomes between groups. Results: A total of 40 patients underwent ISU for urethral cuff erosion and met the follow-up criteria. Median patient age was 76 years old with median erosion defect size of 46% (IQR: 20-50%); 15 men (37.5%) had mild erosions and 25 (62.5%) had major erosions. The overall LUTC rate was 53.5% with significantly fewerABSTRACT: Introduction: In-situ urethroplasty (ISU) has been proposed in conjunction with device explant as an acute management strategy after artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) cuff erosion. Previous studies have not shown a clear relationship between extent of erosion and long-term prognosis. Objective: We hypothesize that more extensive erosions are associated with higher rates of lower urinary tract complications (LUTC) and increased need for urinary diversion (UD). Methods: We performed a retrospective study of patients who underwent ISU for AUS cuff erosion from June 2007 to December 2020 with a minimum of 90-day follow up. Patients were stratified into two groups based on the degree of urethral erosion determined endoscopically at the time of device explant - mild erosions (<33% circumferential defect) and major erosions (> 33%). Outcomes included LUTC, AUS reimplantation, and UD. LUTC was defined as urethral strictures, diverticulum, fistulas, and erosions of a secondary AUS. UD was defined as suprapubic tube placement with or without urethral ligation or ileal conduit creation. Kaplan-Meier curves were created to compare outcomes between groups. Results: A total of 40 patients underwent ISU for urethral cuff erosion and met the follow-up criteria. Median patient age was 76 years old with median erosion defect size of 46% (IQR: 20-50%); 15 men (37.5%) had mild erosions and 25 (62.5%) had major erosions. The overall LUTC rate was 53.5% with significantly fewer complications noted with mild erosions (28.6% vs 65.4%, p = 0.002) (Figure 1). Ultimately, 35.0% of patients required permanent UD with decreased rates in the case of mild erosions (13.3% vs 48.0%, p = 0.04) (Figure 2). On Kaplan-Meier analysis, mild erosion was associated with improved LUTC-free and UD-free survival but not associated with AUS reimplantation. Conclusions: Prognosis after AUS cuff erosion is associated with size of the urethral defect. Patients with extensive cuff erosion are at high risk for LUTCs and permanent UD. Disclosure: Any of the authors act as a consultant, employee or shareholder of an industry for: Boston Scientific and Coloplast … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of sexual medicine. Volume 19:Issue 1(2022)Supplement
- Journal:
- Journal of sexual medicine
- Issue:
- Volume 19:Issue 1(2022)Supplement
- Issue Display:
- Volume 19, Issue 1 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 19
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0019-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- S107
- Page End:
- S108
- Publication Date:
- 2022-04-01
- Subjects:
- Sexual disorders -- Periodicals
Sex -- Periodicals
Sexual health -- Periodicals
616.69005 - Journal URLs:
- http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1743-6109 ↗
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/openurl?genre=journal&eissn=1743-6109 ↗
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/servlet/useragent?func=showIssues&code=jsm ↗
https://academic.oup.com/jsm ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.jsxm.2022.01.228 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1743-6095
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5064.060000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 26721.xml