Extracting hypertrophic cardiomyopathy features from cardiac magnetic resonance reports by natural language processing. (25th November 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Dewaswala-Bhopalwala, N; Chen, D; Bhopalwala, H; Hossein Pour, S; Moon, S; Bos, D; Scott, C; Geske, J; Noseworthy, P; Ommen, S.R; Erickson, B.J; Araoz, P.A; Nishimura, R.A; Ackerman, M.J; Arruda-Olson, A.M
• Is Part Of: European heart journal. Volume 41:(2020)Supplement 2
• Publication Date: 2020-11-25
• Subjects: Cardiac Magnetic Resonance; Cardiology -- Periodicals; Heart -- Diseases -- Periodicals; 616.12005
• DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.0199
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0195-668X

Abstract

Abstract: Objective: Determine if information regarding hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) can be accurately retrieved from cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) reports using natural language processing (NLP). Background: CMR imaging is used for diagnosis and risk stratification of HCM. Manual annotation of information from CMR is time-consuming. NLP is an artificial intelligence method for automating extraction of information from narrative text. Methods: We identified 200 HCM patients who had CMR reports from 1998 to 2018. These patients were randomly allocated into training (100 patients with 185 CMR reports) and testing sets (100 patients with 206 reports). An NLP system with 2 tiers was developed; the first extracted information regarding HCM diagnosis while second extracted categorical or numeric concepts for HCM classification. NLP performance was compared with gold-standard manual annotation. Results: NLP algorithms achieved very high performance across all concepts with mean positive predictive value (PPV) = 0.96. An outlier was the performance for abstracting the presence of an apical pouch from CMR reports, which had noticeably lower PPV= 0.78 which be attributed to the low number of cases with this finding. Conclusions: The algorithms developed can be translated to clinical decision support systems to increase efficiency and contribute to improved quality of care. Funding Acknowledgement: Type of funding source: Other. Main funding source(s): Study supported by the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute of National Institutes of Health (K01HL124045), the Mayo Clinic Center for Clinical and Translational Science (CCaTS), and the Mayo Clinic K2R award. Content is solely the responsibility of authors and does not necessarily represent official views of the National Institutes of Health.