Ending the impasse in Kosovo: partition, decentralization, or consociationalism?. Issue 5 (20th November 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Rossi, Michael
• Is Part Of: Nationalities papers. Volume 42:Issue 5(2014)
• Page Start: 867
• Page End: 889
• Publication Date: 2018-11-20
• Subjects: Serbia -- Kosovo -- consociationalism -- power sharing -- conflict resolution; Ethnology -- Europe, Eastern -- Periodicals; Ethnology -- Former Soviet republics -- Periodicals; Immigrants -- United States -- Periodicals; 305.8
• DOI: 10.1080/00905992.2014.937683
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0090-5992

Abstract

Abstract : This paper argues that current Western-backed approaches to conflict resolution in Kosovo have failed to alter Serbia's policy toward the region and have contributed to the exacerbation of political tensions between Belgrade and Brussels, while deepening ethnic cleavages between Serb and Albanian communities. While there is no possibility of Kosovo returning to Serbia's control, there is an equal unlikelihood that Serbian-populated regions of Kosovo, especially the north, will submit to Pristina's authority. Most importantly, there is little hope that Kosovo can gain full international recognition and membership in international organizations without a compromise settlement with Serbia. While territorial partition has long been a suggested option, I conclude that the best possible solution for Kosovo, given the positions of all parties involved, is a process of significant decentralization beyond the internationally supported measures in the Ahtisaari Plan. A model of consociational power sharing is one in which Serbian and Albanian municipalities are granted high levels of autonomy similar to arrangements made for Bosnia. While this solution may not be ideal and further weakens central authority, I argue that consociationalism reduces the problems of ethnic conflict, encourages local self-government, and preserves the overall territorial integrity of Kosovo.