Cardiovascular magnetic resonance to predict clinical outcome in chronic total coronary artery occlusion. (25th November 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Khedr Abdelaty, A; Budgeon, C; Gulsin, G.S; Hetherington, S; Khunti, K; Ladwiniec, A; Gershlick, A; McCann, G.P; Arnold, J.R
• Is Part Of: European heart journal. Volume 41:(2020)Supplement 2
• Publication Date: 2020-11-25
• Subjects: Coronary Artery Disease: Noninvasive Diagnostic Methods; Cardiology -- Periodicals; Heart -- Diseases -- Periodicals; 616.12005
• DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.1378
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0195-668X

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Chronic total coronary artery occlusions (CTOs) are present in approximately 20–30% of patients undergoing invasive angiography. Despite their prevalence, the optimum management strategy of CTOs remains uncertain. A potential limitation in published trials of CTO revascularisation is their failure to incorporate systematic assessment of ischaemia/viability in informing revascularisation decisions. Aim: We sought to determine the prognostic utility of ischaemia/viability assessment by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in a large, contemporaneous, real-world CTO population. Methods: We retrospectively studied consecutive adult patients with≥1angiographically identified CTO who were referred for clinical CMR imaging during a consecutive 8-year period in our centre (2010–2018). Multi-parametric CMR comprised functional assessment, adenosine-stress perfusion and scar imaging. For perfusion assessment, images were analysed qualitatively with a concurrent examination of scar images. Myocardial segments were assigned to CTO or non-CTO territories according to standard criteria, taking into account coronary dominance. Significant ischaemia was defined as ≥10% and/or ≥2 contiguous myocardial segments with hibernation. Angiographic collateral flow to the CTO territory was graded using the Rentrop classification and the Collateral Connection (CC) Score. Significant CAD in non-CTO vessels was defined angiographically as ≥50% stenosis in any epicardial coronary artery/branch with diameter ≥2mm. The composite clinical endpoint comprised all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction and heart failure hospitalisation. Results: From a total of 27, 201 invasive angiograms performed during the study period, 389 patients were diagnosed with CTO and underwent CMR imaging (mean age 65.0±11.0 years, 84% male). CTO was present most frequently in the right coronary artery (59% of subjects, 229/389), with left circumflex (LCx) artery involvement in 29% (112/389) and left anterior descending (LAD) artery in 29% (111/389). Collaterals with CC grade ≥2 were identified in 186 subjects (48%), and Rentrop score ≥2 in 300 (77%). Significant ischaemia was present in 61% of patients, and infarction in 71% (median infarction 8.6% [interquartile range (IQR) 4.5–14.1]. With a median follow-up time of 3.30 years [IQR 0.04–8.64], 65 (17%) met the composite endpoint. On multivariate analysis, neither significant ischaemia nor infarction was associated with the composite endpoint. However, non-CTO territory ischaemia was independently predictive of adverse outcome (hazard ratio 1.93; 95% CI 1.16–3.21; p=0.0113). Conclusion: CTO-territory ischaemia and infarction are not predictive of adverse clinical outcome, challenging the assertion that CTO revascularisation may be guided by ischaemia assessment. The finding that non-CTO territory ischaemia is associated with adverse cardiovascular events warrants further investigation. Funding Acknowledgement: Type of funding source: Foundation. Main funding source(s): British Heart Foundation