High-density lipoprotein cholesterol does not predict future cardiovascular events in patients treated with statins for secondary prevention: an observation from the REAL-CAD study. (25th November 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Nagai, T; Yokota, I; Omote, K; Sakuma, I; Nakagawa, Y; Kamiya, K; Kimura, T; Nagai, R; Anzai, T
• Is Part Of: European heart journal. Volume 41:(2020)Supplement 2
• Publication Date: 2020-11-25
• Subjects: Secondary Prevention; Cardiology -- Periodicals; Heart -- Diseases -- Periodicals; 616.12005
• DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.2956
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0195-668X

Abstract

Abstract: Background: The relation between high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) level after statin therapy and cardiovascular events in patients with stable coronary artery disease remains unclear. Purpose: We sought to determine the association of the HDL-C level after statin therapy with cardiovascular events in stable coronary artery disease patients. Methods: This study was a post-hoc analysis of the Randomized Evaluation of Aggressive or Moderate Lipid Lowering Therapy with Pitavastatin in Coronary Artery Disease (REAL-CAD) study, which is randomised, open-label, blinded endpoint, physician-initiated, superiority clinical trial. Enrollment was from January 2010 to March 2013, and follow-up was through January 2016. From the main study, we excluded the patients without either HDL-C data at baseline or 6 months, with occurrence of the primary outcome at 6 months and reported poor adherence for pitavastatin. The primary outcome of interest was a composite of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal ischemic stroke, or unstable angina requiring emergent admission after 6 months from randomisation, consistent with the primary analysis of the trial. We constructed landmark Cox proportional hazards regression models with the 18 selected clinically relevant risk-adjusting variables during the entire follow-up period starting at 6 months after randomisation. Absolute and relative changes of HDL-C level were defined as (6 months value – baseline value) and (absolute change / baseline value) × 100, respectively. Results: Among 14, 774 participants in the REAL-CAD study, 9, 221 patients were included in this analysis (7652 [83.0%] male; median [IQR] age, 70 [63–75] years; median [IQR] HDL-C, 49 [42–57] mg/dL; median [IQR] low-density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDL-C], 88 [75–101] mg/dL). During a median follow-up period of 4.0 (IQR 3.2–4.7) years, the primary outcome occurred in 417 (4.5%) patients. There was no significant difference in crude and adjusted cumulative incidence of the primary outcome among the quartiles of HDL-C level at 6 months (Figure 1). The adjusted risks of all the HDL-C related variables (baseline value, 6 months value, absolute and relative changes) for the primary outcome were not significant (Figure 2). Furthermore, the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) as HDL-C level at 6 months increased by 10 mg/dL remained non-significant for the primary outcome for each on-treatment LDL-C level at 6 months (<70 mg/dL [HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.82–1.15], 70–100 mg/dL [HR 1.10, 95% CI 0.98–1.24], and ≥100 mg/dL [HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.78–1.13]). There was also no significant association between HDL-C level at 6 months and the primary outcome both in the low (1 mg/day [HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.91–1.14], increased by 10 mg/dL) dose and high (4 mg/day [HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.91–1.19]) dose pitavastatin groups Conclusion: After statin therapy with modestly controlled LDL-C, HDL-C level has little prognostic value in patients with stable coronary artery disease. Funding Acknowledgement: Type of funding source: Foundation. Main funding source(s): The Comprehensive Support Project for Clinical Research of Lifestyle-Related Disease of the Public Health Research Foundation