Longitudinal associations of social support, everyday social interactions, and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic. (May 2023)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Chin, Brian N.; Kamarck, Thomas W.; Kraut, Robert E.; Zhao, Siyan; Hong, Jason I.; Ding, Emily Y.
• Other Names: Leavitt Chelom E. guest-editor.; Karremans Johan C. guest-editor.
• Is Part Of: Journal of social and personal relationships. Volume 40:Number 5(2023)
• Page Start: 1579
• Page End: 1600
• Publication Date: 2023-05
• Subjects: Social support -- social interactions -- ecological momentary assessment -- depression -- stress -- pleasantness -- COVID-19; Interpersonal relations -- Periodicals; Social interaction -- Periodicals; 302.05
• DOI: 10.1177/02654075221130786
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0265-4075

Abstract

Main effect models contend that perceived social support benefits mental health in the presence and the absence of stressful events, whereas stress-buffering models contend that perceived social support benefits mental health especially when individuals are facing stressful events. We tested these models of how perceived social support impacts mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic and evaluated whether characteristics of everyday social interactions statistically mediated this association – namely, (a) received support, the visible and deliberate assistance provided by others, and (b) pleasantness, the extent to which an interaction is positive, flows easily, and leads individuals to feel understood and validated. 591 United States adults completed a 3-week ecological momentary assessment protocol sampling characteristics of their everyday social interactions that was used to evaluate between-person average values and within-person daily fluctuations in everyday social interaction characteristics. Global measures of perceived social support and pandemic-related stressors were assessed at baseline. Psychiatric symptoms of depression and anxiety were assessed at baseline, at the end of each day of ecological momentary assessment, and at 3-week follow-up. Consistent with a main effect model, higher baseline perceived social support predicted decreases in psychiatric symptoms at 3-week follow-up (β = −.09, p = .001). Contrary to a stress-buffering model, we did not find an interaction of pandemic-stressors × perceived social support. The main effect of perceived social support on mental health was mediated by the pleasantness of everyday social interactions, but not by received support in everyday social interactions. We found evidence for both main effects and stress-buffering effects of within-person fluctuations in interaction pleasantness on daily changes in mental health. Results suggest the importance of everyday social interaction characteristics, especially their pleasantness, in linking perceived social support and mental health.