Differential multivariable risk prediction of appropriate shock versus competing mortality - A prospective cohort study to estimate benefits from ICD therapy. (1st December 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Bergau, Leonard; Willems, Rik; Sprenkeler, David J.; Fischer, Thomas H.; Flevari, Panayota; Hasenfuß, Gerd; Katsaras, Dimitrios; Kirova, Aleksandra; Lehnart, Stephan E.; Lüthje, Lars; Röver, Christian; Seegers, Joachim; Sossalla, Samuel; Dunnink, Albert; Sritharan, Rajevaa; Tuinenburg, Anton E.; Vandenberk, Bert; Vos, Marc A.; Wijers, Sofieke C.; Friede, Tim; Zabel, Markus
• Is Part Of: International journal of cardiology. Volume 272(2018)
• Page Start: 102
• Page End: 107
• Publication Date: 2018-12-01
• Subjects: Implantable cardioverter defibrillator -- Risk factors -- Mortality -- Sudden cardiac death; Cardiology -- Periodicals; Electronic journals; 616.12
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.06.103
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0167-5273

Abstract

Abstract: Background and objective: We prospectively investigated combinations of risk stratifiers including multiple EP diagnostics in a cohort study of ICD patients. Methods: For 672 enrolled patients, we collected history, LVEF, EP study and T-wave alternans testing, 24-h Holter, NT-proBNP, and the eGFR. All-cause mortality and first appropriate ICD shock were predefined endpoints. Results: The 635 patients included in the final analyses were 63 ± 13 years old, 81% were male, LVEF averaged 40 ± 14%, 20% were inducible at EP study, 63% had a primary prophylactic ICD. During follow-up over 4.3 ± 1.5 years, 108 patients died (4.0% per year), and appropriate shock therapy occurred in n = 96 (3.9% per year). In multivariate regression, age (p < 0.001), LVEF (p < 0.001), NYHA functional class (p = 0.007), eGFR (p = 0.024), a history of atrial fibrillation (p = 0.011), and NT-pro-BNP (p = 0.002) were predictors of mortality. LVEF (p = 0.002), inducibility at EP study (p = 0.007), and secondary prophylaxis (p = 0.002) were identified as independent predictors of appropriate shocks. A high annualized risk of shocks of about 10% per year was prevalent in the upper quintile of the shock score. In contrast, a low annual risk of shocks (1.8% per year) was found in the lower two quintiles of the shock score. The lower two quintiles of the mortality score featured an annual mortality <0.6%. Conclusions: In a prospective ICD patient cohort, a very good approximation of mortality versus arrhythmic risk was possible using a multivariable diagnostic strategy. EP stimulation is the best test to assess risk of arrhythmias resulting in ICD shocks. Highlights: We investigated combinations of risk stratifiers in a prospective ICD cohort study. All-cause mortality and first appropriate ICD shock were predefined endpoints. Age, LVEF, NYHA, eGFR, Afib, and NT-pro-BNP were excellent mortality predictors. EP stimulation is the best test to assess risk of arrhythmias resulting in ICD shocks. Excellent approximation of mortality versus arrhythmic risk was possible.