'Lost, Enfeebled, and Deprived of Its Vital Effect': Mill's Exaggerated View of the Relation Between Conflict and Vitality. (2nd July 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Simpson, Robert Mark
• Is Part Of: Supplement to the proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. Volume 95(2021)
• Page Start: 97
• Page End: 114
• Publication Date: 2021-07-02
• Subjects: Philosophy -- Periodicals; Philosophy -- Congresses; Periodicals; 100
• DOI: 10.1093/arisup/akab006
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0309-7013

Abstract

Abstract: Mill thinks our attitudes should be held in a way that's active and 'alive'. He believes attitudes that lack these qualities—those held dogmatically, or in unreflective conformity—are inimical to our well-being. This claim then serves as a premiss in his argument for overarching principles of liberty. He argues that attitudinal vitality, in the relevant sense, relies upon people experiencing (and being open to) attitudinal conflict, and that this necessitates a prioritization of personal liberties. I argue that, pace Mill, contestation isn't required for attitudinal vitality. I describe one species of attitudinal vitality that isn't reliant upon conflict.