Energy-saving potential assessment of a classroom building envelope through sensitivity analysis and multi-objective optimization under different climate types. (May 2023)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Benaddi, Fatima Zahra; Boukhattem, Lahcen; Ait Nouh, Fatima; Cesar Tabares-Velasco, Paulo; Benhamou, Brahim
• Is Part Of: Building services engineering research & technology. Volume 44:Number 3(2023)
• Page Start: 309
• Page End: 332
• Publication Date: 2023-05
• Subjects: Multi-objective optimization -- sensitivity analysis -- classroom building envelope -- thermal loads -- energy saving -- moroccan climate zones; Buildings -- Environmental engineering -- Periodicals; Buildings -- Environmental engineering -- Research -- Periodicals; Sanitary engineering -- Periodicals; 696.05
• DOI: 10.1177/01436244231161944
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0143-6244

Abstract

The present work aims to optimize the thermal behavior of a building envelope by combining sensitivity analysis (SA) and multi-objective optimization (MOO). An existing classroom located in Marrakech city was considered a case study building. The building model was analyzed under six Moroccan climate zones. The SA was applied on 16 design variables and performed using the Morris method implemented in the tool Simlab to rank each design variable based on its influence on the objective function (overall energy demand). The SA results showed that the solar absorptance of the internal roof, wall, and ground floor and the ground hollow core slab thickness impacted less the overall energy demand. Therefore, the only remaining variables showing the most relevant effect will be optimized afterward. The optimization phase was conducted by coupling the generic optimization tool GenOpt with TRNSYS. The optimum solution was selected based on the Pareto front approach. The obtained results assessed the effectiveness of the adopted methodological approach in significant minimization of the required thermal loads. Furthermore, the values of each optimum design variables set differ from one climate zone to another; leading to energy demand reduction varying from 30 to 42%, in comparison with the original design building.