Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Anterior Cervical Corpectomy with Fusion, Laminoplasty, and Laminectomy and Instrumented Fusion for Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. Issue 3 (7th February 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Yu, Hui; Li, Xian; Chen, Shu; Zhang, Li; Yang, Ge; Welle, Kristian; Gathen, Martin; Kabir, Koroush
• Is Part Of: Journal of investigative surgery. Volume 35:Issue 3(2022)
• Page Start: 667
• Page End: 676
• Publication Date: 2022-02-07
• Subjects: Laminoplasty -- anterior cervical corpectomy with fusion -- laminectomy and instrumented fusion -- network meta-analysis; Surgery -- Research -- Periodicals; Research; Surgery; Surgical Procedures, Operative; 617.075
• DOI: 10.1080/08941939.2020.1871535
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0894-1939

Abstract

Abstract: Background: To evaluate the comparative effectiveness and safety of anterior cervical corpectomy with fusion (ACCF), laminoplasty (LP), and laminectomy and instrumented fusion (LF) in the treatment of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). Methods: Embase, Pubmed, and Cochrane library were searched from their date of inception to June 13, 2020. Relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies comparing different procedures among ACCF, LP, and LF were identified, data were extracted to perform a network meta-analysis (NMA). The outcomes were the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score and complications. Results: We deemed 14 trials eligible, including 877 patients. In NMA, ACCF showed a significant improvement of JOA score compared with LP [MD= −0.89, 95% CI (–1.73, −0.18)], but no significant difference was found when compared LF with ACCF or LP. No significant differences in complications were found when compared LF with LP or ACCF, while ACCF showed significantly higher in complications than LP [OR = 1.99, 95% CI (1.10, 3.35)]. The surface under the cumulative ranking curves (SUCRA) showed that the rank of JOA score improvement is as follows: ACCF (82.5%), LF (79.5%), and LP (2.3%). And the rank of complication rate is as follows: LF (65.8%), ACCF (68.4%), and LP (2.1%). Limitation: The biggest limitation was that none of the included studies were RCTs. Conclusions: Despite the higher probability of complications than LP, ACCF was the more recommended procedure for its highest ranking spectrums of JOA score improvement to treat the OPLL.