Sarcoma European and Latin American Network (SELNET) Recommendations on Prioritization in Sarcoma Care During the COVID‐19 Pandemic. (23rd September 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Sarcoma European and Latin American Network (SELNET) Recommendations on Prioritization in Sarcoma Care During the COVID‐19 Pandemic. (23rd September 2020)
- Main Title:
- Sarcoma European and Latin American Network (SELNET) Recommendations on Prioritization in Sarcoma Care During the COVID‐19 Pandemic
- Authors:
- Martin‐Broto, Javier
Hindi, Nadia
Aguiar, Samuel
Badilla‐González, Ronald
Castro‐Oliden, Victor
Chacón, Matias
Correa‐Generoso, Raquel
Álava, Enrique
Donati, Davide María
Eriksson, Mikael
Falla‐Jimenez, Martin
German, Gisela
Gobo Silva, Maria Leticia
Gouin, Francois
Gronchi, Alessandro
Haro‐Varas, Juan Carlos
Jiménez‐Brenes, Natalia
Kasper, Bernd
Lopes de Mello, Celso Abdon
Maki, Robert
Martínez‐Delgado, Paula
Martínez‐Said, Hector
Martinez‐Tlahuel, Jorge Luis
Morales‐Pérez, Jose Manuel
Muñoz‐Casares, Francisco Cristobal
Nakagawa, Suely A.
Ortiz‐Cruz, Eduardo Jose
Palmerini, Emanuela
Patel, Shreyaskumar
Moura, David S.
Stacchiotti, Silvia
Sunyach, Marie Pierre
Valverde, Claudia M.
Waisberg, Federico
Blay, Jean‐Yves
… (more) - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: The COVID‐19 outbreak has resulted in collision between patients infected with SARS‐CoV‐2 and those with cancer on different fronts. Patients with cancer have been impacted by deferral, modification, and even cessation of therapy. Adaptive measures to minimize hospital exposure, following the precautionary principle, have been proposed for cancer care during COVID‐19 era. We present here a consensus on prioritizing recommendations across the continuum of sarcoma patient care. Material and Methods: A total of 125 recommendations were proposed in soft‐tissue, bone, and visceral sarcoma care. Recommendations were assigned as higher or lower priority if they cannot or can be postponed at least 2–3 months, respectively. The consensus level for each recommendation was classified as "strongly recommended" (SR) if more than 90% of experts agreed, "recommended" (R) if 75%–90% of experts agreed and "no consensus" (NC) if fewer than 75% agreed. Sarcoma experts from 11 countries within the Sarcoma European‐Latin American Network (SELNET) consortium participated, including countries in the Americas and Europe. The European Society for Medical Oncology‐Magnitude of clinical benefit scale was applied to systemic‐treatment recommendations to support prioritization. Results: There were 80 SRs, 35 Rs, and 10 NCs among the 125 recommendations issued and completed by 31 multidisciplinary sarcoma experts. The consensus was higher among the 75 higher‐priority recommendationsAbstract: Background: The COVID‐19 outbreak has resulted in collision between patients infected with SARS‐CoV‐2 and those with cancer on different fronts. Patients with cancer have been impacted by deferral, modification, and even cessation of therapy. Adaptive measures to minimize hospital exposure, following the precautionary principle, have been proposed for cancer care during COVID‐19 era. We present here a consensus on prioritizing recommendations across the continuum of sarcoma patient care. Material and Methods: A total of 125 recommendations were proposed in soft‐tissue, bone, and visceral sarcoma care. Recommendations were assigned as higher or lower priority if they cannot or can be postponed at least 2–3 months, respectively. The consensus level for each recommendation was classified as "strongly recommended" (SR) if more than 90% of experts agreed, "recommended" (R) if 75%–90% of experts agreed and "no consensus" (NC) if fewer than 75% agreed. Sarcoma experts from 11 countries within the Sarcoma European‐Latin American Network (SELNET) consortium participated, including countries in the Americas and Europe. The European Society for Medical Oncology‐Magnitude of clinical benefit scale was applied to systemic‐treatment recommendations to support prioritization. Results: There were 80 SRs, 35 Rs, and 10 NCs among the 125 recommendations issued and completed by 31 multidisciplinary sarcoma experts. The consensus was higher among the 75 higher‐priority recommendations (85%, 12%, and 3% for SR, R, and NC, respectively) than in the 50 lower‐priority recommendations (32%, 52%, and 16% for SR, R, and NC, respectively). Conclusion: The consensus on 115 of 125 recommendations indicates a high‐level of convergence among experts. The SELNET consensus provides a tool for sarcoma multidisciplinary treatment committees during the COVID‐19 outbreak. Abstract : The COVID‐19 pandemic has caused deferral, modification, or cessation of treatment for patients with cancer. This article presents a consensus on prioritizing recommendations across the continuum of sarcoma patient care. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Oncologist. Volume 25:Number 10(2020)
- Journal:
- Oncologist
- Issue:
- Volume 25:Number 10(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 25, Issue 10 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 25
- Issue:
- 10
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0025-0010-0000
- Page Start:
- e1562
- Page End:
- e1573
- Publication Date:
- 2020-09-23
- Subjects:
- COVID‐19 -- Sarcoma -- Guidelines -- Patient care -- Multidisciplinary
Oncology -- Periodicals
Tumors -- Periodicals
Cancérologie -- Périodiques
Tumeurs -- Périodiques
Oncology
Tumors
Neoplasms
Electronic journals
Periodicals
Periodicals
616.994 - Journal URLs:
- https://academic.oup.com/oncolo ↗
https://theoncologist.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/1549490x ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1634/theoncologist.2020-0516 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1083-7159
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 6256.890000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 26519.xml