Phase II Study of Low‐Dose Afatinib Maintenance Treatment Among Patients with EGFR‐Mutated Non‐Small Cell Lung Cancer: North Japan Lung Cancer Study Group Trial 1601 (NJLCG1601). (7th July 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Phase II Study of Low‐Dose Afatinib Maintenance Treatment Among Patients with EGFR‐Mutated Non‐Small Cell Lung Cancer: North Japan Lung Cancer Study Group Trial 1601 (NJLCG1601). (7th July 2020)
- Main Title:
- Phase II Study of Low‐Dose Afatinib Maintenance Treatment Among Patients with EGFR‐Mutated Non‐Small Cell Lung Cancer: North Japan Lung Cancer Study Group Trial 1601 (NJLCG1601)
- Authors:
- Nakamura, Atsushi
Tanaka, Hisashi
Saito, Ryota
Suzuki, Aya
Harada, Toshiyuki
Inoue, Sumito
Yamada, Toru
Nakagawa, Taku
Jingu, Daisuke
Sugawara, Shunichi - Abstract:
- Abstract: Lessons Learned : Low‐dose afatinib maintenance treatment among patients with EGFR ‐mutated NSCLC achieved long‐time to treatment failure with fewer treatment‐related AEs without detracting from the therapeutic efficacy. This modified regimen represents a practical usage that balances effectiveness and safety. Background: Although afatinib is an effective therapy for patients with EGFR ‐mutated non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), drug‐related adverse events (AEs) have often necessitated dose reductions. In a post hoc analysis of the LUX‐Lung 3 and 6 trials, there was no difference in median progression‐free survival (PFS) between patients who had the dose of afatinib reduced and those who did not. We thus evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of low‐dose afatinib maintenance treatment among patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations who had not been previously treated. Methods: Eligible patients received afatinib 40 mg orally once daily. When prescribed grade ≥ 2 AEs, rash of grade ≥ 3, or unacceptable toxicity occurred, the afatinib dose was reduced from 40 to 30 mg and if needed from 30 to 20 mg. The primary endpoint was the 1‐year PFS rate. Secondary endpoints were PFS, overall response rate (ORR), and toxicity. Results: Among 30 patients, 93% had adenocarcinoma, 53% had exon 19 deletion, 37% had L858R, and 10% had minor mutations. The 1‐year PFS rate was 50% (95% confidence interval [CI], 31.3–66.1) and the median PFS was 11.8 months (95% CI, 7.1–21.4). TheAbstract: Lessons Learned : Low‐dose afatinib maintenance treatment among patients with EGFR ‐mutated NSCLC achieved long‐time to treatment failure with fewer treatment‐related AEs without detracting from the therapeutic efficacy. This modified regimen represents a practical usage that balances effectiveness and safety. Background: Although afatinib is an effective therapy for patients with EGFR ‐mutated non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), drug‐related adverse events (AEs) have often necessitated dose reductions. In a post hoc analysis of the LUX‐Lung 3 and 6 trials, there was no difference in median progression‐free survival (PFS) between patients who had the dose of afatinib reduced and those who did not. We thus evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of low‐dose afatinib maintenance treatment among patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations who had not been previously treated. Methods: Eligible patients received afatinib 40 mg orally once daily. When prescribed grade ≥ 2 AEs, rash of grade ≥ 3, or unacceptable toxicity occurred, the afatinib dose was reduced from 40 to 30 mg and if needed from 30 to 20 mg. The primary endpoint was the 1‐year PFS rate. Secondary endpoints were PFS, overall response rate (ORR), and toxicity. Results: Among 30 patients, 93% had adenocarcinoma, 53% had exon 19 deletion, 37% had L858R, and 10% had minor mutations. The 1‐year PFS rate was 50% (95% confidence interval [CI], 31.3–66.1) and the median PFS was 11.8 months (95% CI, 7.1–21.4). The incidence rate of grade ≥ 3 toxicities was 57%, including elevated aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase level (13%), diarrhea (10%), and paronychia (10%). Conclusion: Low‐dose afatinib maintenance treatment reduced treatment‐related AEs without detracting from the therapeutic efficacy. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Oncologist. Volume 25:Number 10(2020)
- Journal:
- Oncologist
- Issue:
- Volume 25:Number 10(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 25, Issue 10 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 25
- Issue:
- 10
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0025-0010-0000
- Page Start:
- e1451
- Page End:
- e1456
- Publication Date:
- 2020-07-07
- Subjects:
- Oncology -- Periodicals
Tumors -- Periodicals
Cancérologie -- Périodiques
Tumeurs -- Périodiques
Oncology
Tumors
Neoplasms
Electronic journals
Periodicals
Periodicals
616.994 - Journal URLs:
- https://academic.oup.com/oncolo ↗
https://theoncologist.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/1549490x ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1634/theoncologist.2020-0545 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1083-7159
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 6256.890000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 26509.xml