Clearing the Cervical Spine in a War Zone: What Other Injuries Matter?. Issue 7 (1st July 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Drew, Jennifer; Chou, Victoria B.; Miller, Catriona; Borg, Bryson; Ingalls, Nichole; Shackelford, Stacy
• Is Part Of: Military medicine. Volume 180:Issue 7(2015)
• Page Start: 792
• Page End: 797
• Publication Date: 2015-07-01
• Subjects: Surgery, Military -- Societies, etc; Medicine, Military -- Societies, etc; Medicine, Military -- Periodicals; Surgery, Military -- Periodicals; Medicine, Military; Surgery, Military; Military Medicine -- Periodicals; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 616.98023
• DOI: 10.7205/MILMED-D-14-00635
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0026-4075

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Background: Cervical spine clearance requires clinicians to assess the reliability of physical examination based on a patient's mental status and distracting injuries. Distracting injuries have never been clearly defined in military casualties. Methods: Retrospective review was conducted of patients entered into Department of Defense Trauma Registry January 2008 to August 2013, identifying blunt trauma patients with cervical spine injury and Glasgow Coma Score ≥ 14. Physical examination and radiology results were abstracted from medical records and injury diagnoses were obtained from Department of Defense Trauma Registry. Groups were compared, p -value of < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: A total of 149 patients met study criteria; 20 patients (13%) had a negative clinical examination of the cervical spine. Coexisting injuries identified in patients with negative physical examination included injuries in proximity to the neck (head, thoracic spine, chest, or humerus) in 17 (85%) patients. In 3 patients (15%), coexisting injuries were not in proximity to the neck and included pelvic, femur, and tibia fractures. All patients without coexisting injury ( n = 37) had a positive physical examination. Conclusion: Physical examination of multitrauma casualties with neck injury may be unreliable when distracting injuries are present. When no distracting injuries were present, the physical examination was accurate in all patients.