3D deep convolution neural network for radiation pneumonitis prediction following stereotactic body radiotherapy. Issue 3 (22nd December 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kapoor, Rishabh; Sleeman, William; Palta, Jatinder; Weiss, Elisabeth
• Is Part Of: Journal of applied clinical medical physics. Volume 24:Issue 3(2023)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2022-12-22
• Subjects: artificial intelligence -- deep learning -- DenseNet 121 -- outcome prediction -- radiation pneumonitis -- ResNet‐50; Medical physics -- Periodicals; Clinical medicine -- Periodicals; Health Physics; Clinical Medicine; Electronic journals; Periodicals; Periodicals; Fulltext; Internet Resources; 610.153
• DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13875
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1526-9914

Abstract

Abstract: In this study, we investigated 3D convolutional neural networks (CNNs) with input from radiographic and dosimetric datasets of primary lung tumors and surrounding lung volumes to predict the likelihood of radiation pneumonitis (RP). Pre‐treatment, 3‐ and 6‐month follow‐up computed tomography (CT) and 3D dose datasets from one hundred and ninety‐three NSCLC patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) were retrospectively collected and analyzed for this study. DenseNet‐121 and ResNet‐50 models were selected for this study as they are deep neural networks and have been proven to have high accuracy for complex image classification tasks. Both were modified with 3D convolution and max pooling layers to accept 3D datasets. We used a minority class oversampling approach and data augmentation to address the challenges of data imbalance and data scarcity. We built two sets of models for classification of three (No RP, Grade 1 RP, Grade 2 RP) and two (No RP, Yes RP) classes as outputs. The 3D DenseNet‐121 models performed better (F1 score [0.81], AUC [0.91] [three class]; F1 score [0.77], AUC [0.84] [two class]) than the 3D ResNet‐50 models (F1 score [0.54], AUC [0.72] [three‐class]; F1 score [0.68], AUC [0.71] [two‐class]) ( p = 0.017 for three class predictions). We also attempted to identify salient regions within the input 3D image dataset via integrated gradient (IG) techniques to assess the relevance of the tumor surrounding volume for RP stratification. These techniques appeared to indicate the significance of the tumor and surrounding regions in the prediction of RP. Overall, 3D CNNs performed well to predict clinical RP in our cohort based on the provided image sets and radiotherapy dose information.