Echocardiography‐ versus intracardiac electrocardiogram‐based optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy: A systematic review. Issue 2 (6th January 2023)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Sami, Abdul; Mustafa, Bilal; Butt, Hamza Ahmed; Ashraf, Zainab; Ullah, Asif; Babar, Farheen; Asad, Muhammad; Awais, Muhammad; Zaidi, Syed Muhammad Jawad; Fakhar, Tehniat; Mehmoodi, Amin; Adnan, Nawal; Malik, Jahanzeb
• Is Part Of: Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology. Volume 28:Issue 2(2023)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2023-01-06
• Subjects: heart failure -- ventricular synchrony; Electrocardiography -- Periodicals; Arrhythmia -- Periodicals; 616.1207547
• DOI: 10.1111/anec.13040
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1082-720X

Abstract

Abstract: Objective: This systematic review aimed to evaluate the performance of echocardiography‐based programming in comparison with the intracardiac electrocardiogram (IEGM)‐based method for the optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Methods: A literature review was conducted using digital databases to systematically identify the studies reporting CRT optimization through echocardiography compared with IEGM. Detailed patient‐level study characteristics including the type of study, sample size, therapy, the New York Heart Classification (NYHA) status, lead placement, and other parameters were abstracted. Finally, postprogramming outcomes were extracted for each article. Results: In a total of 11 studies, 919 patients were recruited for the final analysis. Overall, 692 (75.29%) were males. The mean duration of the QRS complex in our study population ranged from 145.2 ± 21.8 ms to 183 ± 19.9 ms. There was an equal improvement in the NYHA class between the two methods while the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) demonstrated an improvement by IEGM. Many studies supported IEGM to increase the 6‐minute walk test and left ventricular outflow tract velocity time interval (LVOT VTI) when compared to echocardiography. The mean time for echocardiography‐based optimization was 60.15 min while that of IEGM‐based optimization was 6.65 min. Conclusion: IEGM is an alternative method for CRT optimization in improving the NYHA class, LVEF, and LVOT VTI, and is less time‐consuming when compared to the echocardiography‐based methods. Abstract : In a total of 11 studies, recruiting 919 patients, IEGM is demonstrated as an alternative method for CRT optimization in improving clinical outcomes and is less time‐consuming when compared to the echocardiography‐based methods.