Experimental studies of adaptation in Clarkia xantiana. III. Phenotypic selection across a subspecies border. (1st September 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Anderson, Jill T.; Eckhart, Vincent M.; Geber, Monica A.
• Is Part Of: Evolution. Volume 69:Number 9(2015:Sep.)
• Page Start: 2249
• Page End: 2261
• Publication Date: 2015-09-01
• Subjects: Contact zone -- natural selection -- phenotypic selection analysis -- range margins -- reciprocal transplant -- parapatric geographic distributions; Evolution -- Periodicals; Heredity -- Periodicals; Évolution (Biologie) -- Périodiques; Hérédité -- Périodiques; 338.47004094
• DOI: 10.1111/evo.12745
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0014-3820

Abstract

Abstract: Sister taxa with distinct phenotypes often occupy contrasting environments in parapatric ranges, yet we generally do not know whether trait divergence reflects spatially varying selection. We conducted a reciprocal transplant experiment to test whether selection favors "native phenotypes" in two subspecies of Clarkia xantiana (Onagraceae), an annual plant in California. For four quantitative traits that differ between subspecies, we estimated phenotypic selection in subspecies' exclusive ranges and their contact zone in two consecutive years. We predicted that in the arid, pollinator‐scarce eastern region, selection favors phenotypes of the native subspecies parviflora : small leaves, slow leaf growth, early flowering, and diminutive flowers. In the wetter, pollinator‐rich, western range of subspecies xantiana, we expected selection for opposite phenotypes. We investigated pollinator contributions to selection by comparing naturally pollinated and pollen‐supplemented individuals. For reproductive traits and for subspecies xantiana, selection generally matched expectations. The contact zone sometimes showed distinctive selection, and in ssp. parviflora selection sometimes favored nonnative phenotypes. Pollinators influenced selection on flowering time but not on flower size. Little temporal variation in selection occurred, possibly because of plastic trait responses across years. Though there were exceptions and some causes of selection remain obscure, phenotypic differentiation between subspecies appears to reflect spatially variable selection.