Field measurements of genotype by environment interaction for fitness caused by spontaneous mutations in Arabidopsis thaliana. (1st May 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Roles, Angela J.; Rutter, Matthew T.; Dworkin, Ian; Fenster, Charles B.; Conner, Jeffrey K.
• Is Part Of: Evolution. Volume 70:Number 5(2016)
• Page Start: 1039
• Page End: 1050
• Publication Date: 2016-05-01
• Subjects: Crossing GEI -- mutation accumulation -- mutation‐selection balance -- variance GEI; Evolution -- Periodicals; Heredity -- Periodicals; Évolution (Biologie) -- Périodiques; Hérédité -- Périodiques; 338.47004094
• DOI: 10.1111/evo.12913
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0014-3820

Abstract

Abstract: As the ultimate source of genetic diversity, spontaneous mutation is critical to the evolutionary process. The fitness effects of spontaneous mutations are almost always studied under controlled laboratory conditions rather than under the evolutionarily relevant conditions of the field. Of particular interest is the conditionality of new mutations—that is, is a new mutation harmful regardless of the environment in which it is found? In other words, what is the extent of genotype–environment interaction for spontaneous mutations? We studied the fitness effects of 25 generations of accumulated spontaneous mutations in Arabidopsis thaliana in two geographically widely separated field environments, in Michigan and Virginia. At both sites, mean total fitness of mutation accumulation lines exceeded that of the ancestors, contrary to the expected decrease in the mean due to new mutations but in accord with prior work on these MA lines. We observed genotype–environment interactions in the fitness effects of new mutations, such that the effects of mutations in Michigan were a poor predictor of their effects in Virginia and vice versa. In particular, mutational variance for fitness was much larger in Virginia compared to Michigan. This strong genotype–environment interaction would increase the amount of genetic variation maintained by mutation‐selection balance.