Interoperator reliability of an on-site machine learning-based prototype to estimate CT angiography-derived fractional flow reserve. Issue 1 (21st March 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Han, Yushui; Ahmed, Ahmed Ibrahim; Schwemmer, Chris; Cocker, Myra; Alnabelsi, Talal S; Saad, Jean Michel; Ramirez Giraldo, Juan C; Al-Mallah, Mouaz H
• Is Part Of: Open heart. Volume 9:Issue 1(2022)
• Publication Date: 2022-03-21
• Subjects: Computed Tomography Angiography -- CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE -- Biostatistics; Cardiology -- Periodicals; Heart -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Heart -- Diseases -- Patients -- Periodicals; 616.12005
• DOI: 10.1136/openhrt-2021-001951
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2398-595X

Abstract

Abstract : Background: Advances in CT and machine learning have enabled on-site non-invasive assessment of fractional flow reserve (FFRCT ). Purpose: To assess the interoperator and intraoperator variability of coronary CT angiography-derived FFRCT using a machine learning-based postprocessing prototype. Materials and methods: We included 60 symptomatic patients who underwent coronary CT angiography. FFRCT was calculated by two independent operators after training using a machine learning-based on-site prototype. FFRCT was measured 1 cm distal to the coronary plaque or in the middle of the segments if no coronary lesions were present. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis were used to evaluate interoperator variability effect in FFRCT estimates. Sensitivity analysis was done by cardiac risk factors, degree of stenosis and image quality. Results: A total of 535 coronary segments in 60 patients were assessed. The overall ICC was 0.986 per patient (95% CI 0.977 to 0.992) and 0.972 per segment (95% CI 0.967 to 0.977). The absolute mean difference in FFRCT estimates was 0.012 per patient (95% CI for limits of agreement: −0.035 to 0.039) and 0.02 per segment (95% CI for limits of agreement: −0.077 to 0.080). Tight limits of agreement were seen on Bland-Altman analysis. Distal segments had greater variability compared with proximal/mid segments (absolute mean difference 0.011 vs 0.025, p<0.001). Results were similar on sensitivity analysis. Conclusion: A high degree of interoperator and intraoperator reproducibility can be achieved by on-site machine learning-based FFRCT assessment. Future research is required to evaluate the physiological relevance and prognostic value of FFRCT .