Exploring Male Multiple Orgasm in a Large Online Sample: Refining Our Understanding. Issue 9 (14th August 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Griffin-Mathieu, Gabrielle; Berry, Michael; Shtarkshall, Ronny A.; Amsel, Rhonda; Binik, Yitzchak M.; Gérard, Marina
• Is Part Of: Journal of sexual medicine. Volume 18:Issue 9(2021)
• Page Start: 1652
• Page End: 1661
• Publication Date: 2021-08-14
• Subjects: Multiple Orgasm -- Ejaculation -- Orgasm -- Refractory period -- Psychosexual; Sexual disorders -- Periodicals; Sex -- Periodicals; Sexual health -- Periodicals; 616.69005
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2021.06.017
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1743-6095

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Background: The scientific literature on multiple orgasm in males is small. There is little consensus on a definition, and significant controversy about whether multiple orgasm is a unitary experience. Aims: This study has 2 goals: (i) describing the experience of male multiple orgasm; (ii) investigating whether there are different profiles of multiple orgasm in men. Methods: Data from a culturally diverse online convenience sample of 122 men reporting multiple orgasm were collected. Data reduction analyses were conducted using principal components analysis (PCA) on 13 variables of interest derived from theory and the existing literature. A K -means cluster analysis followed, from which a 4-cluster solution was retained. RESULTS: While the range of reported orgasms varied from 2 to 30, the majority (79.5%, N = 97) of participants experienced between 2 and 4 orgasms separated by a specific time interval during which further stimulation was required to achieve another orgasm. Most participants reported maintaining their erections throughout and ejaculating with every orgasm. Age was not a significant correlate of the multiple orgasm experience which occurred more frequently in a dyadic context. Four different profiles of multiorgasmic men were described. Strengths & Limitations: This study constitutes a rare attempt to collect systematic self-report data concerning the experience of multiple orgasm in a relatively large sample. Limitations include the lack of validated measures, memory bias associated with self-reported data and retrospective designs, the lack of a control group and of physiological measurement. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that multiple orgasm in men is not a unitary phenomenon and sets the stage for future self-report and laboratory study.