"Postulating Penis: What Influences the Interest of Transmasculine Patients in Gender Affirming Penile Reconstruction Techniques?". Issue 2 (15th December 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Parker, Augustus; Blasdel, Gaines; Kloer, Carmen; Kimberly, Laura; Shakir, Nabeel; Robinson, Isabel; Bluebond-Langner, Rachel; Zhao, Lee C.
• Is Part Of: Journal of sexual medicine. Volume 19:Issue 2(2022)
• Page Start: 385
• Page End: 393
• Publication Date: 2021-12-15
• Subjects: Transgender Persons -- Transmasculine -- Sexual Behavior -- Surveys and Questionnaires -- Referral and Consultation -- Decision Making -- Gender Confirmation Surgery -- Patient Preference -- Community Survey; Sexual disorders -- Periodicals; Sex -- Periodicals; Sexual health -- Periodicals; 616.69005
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2021.10.013
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1743-6095

Abstract

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: The limitations of metoidioplasty and phalloplasty have been reported as deterrents for transgender and other gender expansive individuals (T/GE) desiring gender affirming surgery, and thus penile transplantation, epithesis, and composite tissue engineering (CTE) are being explored as alternative interventions. AIM: We aim to understand the acceptability of novel techniques and factors that may influence patient preferences in surgery to best treat this diverse population. METHODS: Descriptions of metoidioplasty, phalloplasty, epithesis, CTE, and penile transplant were delivered via online survey from January 2020 to May 2020. Respondents provided ordinal ranking of interest in each intervention from 1 to 5, with 1 representing greatest personal interest. Demographics found to be significant on univariable analysis underwent multivariable ordinal logistic regression to determine independent predictors of interest. OUTCOMES: Sexual orientation, gender, and age were independent predictors of interest in interventions. Results: There were 965 qualifying respondents. Gay respondents were less likely to be interested in epithesis (OR: 2.282; P = .001) compared to other sexual orientations. Straight individuals were the least likely to be interested in metoidioplasty (OR 3.251; P = . 001), and most interested in penile transplantation (OR 0.382; P = . 005) and phalloplasty (OR 0.288, P < . 001) as potential interventions. Gay and queer respondents showed a significant interest in phalloplasty (Gay: OR 0.472; P = . 004; Queer: OR 0.594; P = . 017). Those who identify as men were more interested in phalloplasty (OR 0.552; P < . 001) than those with differing gender identities. Older age was the only variable associated with a decreased interest in phalloplasty (OR 1.033; P = . 001). No demographic analyzed was an independent predictor of interest in CTE. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: A thorough understanding of patient gender identity, sexual orientation, and sexual behavior should be obtained during consultation for gender affirming penile reconstruction, as these factors influence patient preferences for surgical interventions. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: This study used an anonymous online survey that was distributed through community channels and allowed for the collection of a high quantity of responses throughout the T/GE population that would otherwise be impossible through single-center or in-person means. The community-based methodology minimized barriers to honesty, such as courtesy bias. The survey was only available in English and respondents skewed young and White. CONCLUSION: Despite previously reported concerns about the limitations of metoidioplasty, participants ranked it highly, along with CTE, in terms of personal interest, with sexual orientation, gender, and age independently influencing patient preferences, emphasizing their relevance in patient-surgeon consultations.