The Absence of a Validated English-Language Survey to Assess Prosthesis Satisfaction: A Prospective Cohort Using the Sexual Quality of Life After Penile Prosthesis. Issue 11 (15th August 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Carlos, Evan C.; Nosé, Brent D.; Barton, Gregory J.; Davis, Leah; Lentz, Aaron C.
• Is Part Of: Journal of sexual medicine. Volume 17:Issue 11(2020)
• Page Start: 2307
• Page End: 2310
• Publication Date: 2020-08-15
• Subjects: Penile Prosthesis -- Erectile Dysfunction -- Quality of Life -- Personalized Medicine -- Patient Satisfaction; Sexual disorders -- Periodicals; Sex -- Periodicals; Sexual health -- Periodicals; 616.69005
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2020.07.012
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1743-6095

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Prior assessments of sexual quality of life (SQoL) after penile prosthesis implantation have been performed without validated implant-specific tools. The Quality of Life and Sexuality with Penile Prosthesis (QoLSPP) questionnaire was designed and validated in Italian to specifically evaluate SQoL after a penile prosthesis is placed. Aim: We aim to better characterize prosthesis-specific SQoL after inflatable penile prosthesis placement using the English translation of the QoLSPP questionnaire. Methods: A total of 395 consecutive patients received an inflatable penile prosthesis between January 1, 2009 and November 27, 2017, and 270 had functional emails to whom the QoLSPP questionnaire was sent. 90 surveys were completed by 75 first-time implantees and 15 patients who underwent removal/replacement surgery. Responses were considered positive if ≥ 3. Among first-time implantees, subpopulation analysis was carried out by age at survey completion (<55 years, 55–65 years, and ≥66 years), age of penile prosthesis at survey completion (<1 year, 1–5 years, and >5 years), device model (Coloplast Titan, AMS 700 CX, and AMS LGX), history of a psychiatric diagnosis, etiology of erectile dysfunction, total device length > or ≤ 21 cm, diabetes status, and body mass index < /≥ 30. Responses were analyzed in R using t -tests for continuous variables and Chi-squared tests (Fisher's for small counts) for categorical variables. Outcomes: The main outcome measure of this study was sexual quality of life assessed by QoLSPP. Results: Patients completed the survey on average 3.15 years from their most recent prosthesis placement. 84% of first-time implantees had positive responses. Among them, there were no significant differences in the proportion of positive responses by device type, age, history of a psychiatric diagnosis, total implanted device length, etiology of erectile dysfunction, diabetes, or body mass index statuses (all P > .05). There was no difference in SQoL between first-time implantees and those who underwent removal/replacement surgery ( P = 1.0). Clinical Implications: Patients experience a positive impact on their SQoL following implantation of a penile prosthesis. Strengths & Limitations: Our study is the first to apply the English language QoLSPP which demonstrates high prosthesis specific SQoL but is limited by size and a lack of a validated English language tool. Conclusions: The positive impact on patients' SQoL with penile prosthesis is 84% when assessed by the English QoLSPP questionnaire. While these results mirror those reported from Italy, the English-speaking patient population is plagued with a lack of a validated tool to assess satisfaction, a void the academic and prosthetic community must fill to better understand the impact prostheses have on their patients.