Forensic Implications of the New Classification of ICD-11 Paraphilic Disorders in Brazil. Issue 11 (21st September 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Abdalla-Filho, Elias; de Jesus Mari, Jair; Diehl, Alessandra; Vieira, Denise Leite; Ribeiro, Rafael Bernardon; Marins de Moraes, Talvane; Reed, Geoffrey M.; Kismodi, Eszter; Cordeiro, Quirino
• Is Part Of: Journal of sexual medicine. Volume 16:Issue 11(2019)
• Page Start: 1814
• Page End: 1819
• Publication Date: 2019-09-21
• Subjects: Paraphilic Disorders -- Forensic Psychiatry -- International Classification of Diseases -- Sexual Behavior -- Legal Aspects; Sexual disorders -- Periodicals; Sex -- Periodicals; Sexual health -- Periodicals; 616.69005
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.07.025
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1743-6095

Abstract

Abstract: Introduction: The World Health Organization (WHO) Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse appointed a Working Group on Sexual Disorders and Sexual Health in order to revise and propose changes to ICD-10 categories. Aim: Analyze ethical and legal implications in Brazil of the proposed ICD-11 diagnostic criteria for paraphilic disorders. Methods: A forensic working group of Brazilian experts in collaboration with representatives of WHO reviewed the proposed modifications to the classification of Disorders of Sexual Preference in ICD-10 (F65), which is recommended to be replaced by Paraphilic Disorders in ICD-11. Proposals were reviewed through a medicolegal lens, using a legal and policy analysis guide put forth by WHO. The premise of this review was to understand that, although the ICD classification is intended to provide a basis for clinical and statistical health interventions, medical diagnostics may also be entangled in the complex legal, normative, and political environment of various countries. Main Outcome Measure: The most important proposed change to this section is to limit the concept of paraphilic disorders primarily to patterns of sexual arousal involving a focus on others who are unwilling or unable to consent, but this change has not affected the ethical and legal aspects of psychiatric functioning in the Brazil. Results: Because Brazilian criminal law is directed toward criminal behavior and not to specific psychiatric diagnoses, the changes proposed for ICD-11 are not expected to create obstacles to health services or to modify criminal sentencing. Clinical Implications: Although ICD-11 has a number of changes in its content, there are no significant clinical implications in the Brazilian context, but a better clarity of conceptual definitions and diagnostic criteria. Strengths & Limitations: The study is conducted with people from different Brazilian states, which is important for a comprehensive view. On the other hand, considering that it is a very heterogeneous country, there is the limitation that an even wider scope of the study is not possible. Conclusion: In the Brazilian context, the new guidelines for paraphilic disorders contribute to clinical utility and are not expected to create difficulties related to the legal, social, and economic consequences of sexual offenses in the country.