Correlation of spatial patterns of endocardial pace mapping to underlying scar topography in patients with scar‐related ventricular tachycardia. (22nd January 2023)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kotake, Yasuhito; Bennett, Richard; Silva, Kasun De; Bhaskaran, Ashwin; Kanawati, Juliana; Turnbull, Samual; Zhou, Julia; Kumar, Saurabh; Campbell, Timothy
• Is Part Of: Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology. Volume 34:Number 3(2023)
• Page Start: 638
• Page End: 649
• Publication Date: 2023-01-22
• Subjects: catheter ablation -- intracardiac echocardiography -- pace mapping -- ventricular tachycardia; Blood vessels -- Physiology -- Periodicals; Electrophysiology -- Periodicals; Heart -- Physiology -- Periodicals; 612.1
• DOI: 10.1111/jce.15811
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1045-3873

Abstract

Abstract: Introduction: Endocardial pace mapping (PM) can identify conducting channels for ventricular tachycardia (VT) circuits in patients with structural heart disease (SHD). Recent findings show the temporal and spatial pattern of PM may aid identification of the surface harboring VT isthmii. The specific correlation of PM patterns to scar topography has not been examined. Objective: To correlate the pattern of endocardial PMs to underlying scar topography in SHD patients with VT. Methods: Data from patients undergoing VT ablation from August 2018 to February 2022 were reviewed. Results: Sixty‐three patients with SHD‐related VT (mean age 65 ± 14 years) with 83 endocardial PM correlation maps were analysed. Two main correlation patterns were identified, an "abrupt‐change correlation pattern (AC‐pattern)" and "centrifugal‐attenuation correlation pattern (CA‐pattern)." AC‐pattern had lower scar ratio (unipolar/bipolar % scar area; 1.1 vs. 1.5, p < .001), had longer maximal stimulus‐QRS intervals (97.5 vs. 68 ms, p = .002), and higher likelihood of endocardial dominant scar (11/21 [52%] vs. 3/38 [8%], p < .001) than CA‐pattern seen on intracardiac echocardiography (ICE). In contrast, CA‐pattern was more likely to have epicardial dominant scar or mid‐intramural scar on ICE (epicardial dominant scar; CA‐pattern: 12/38 [32%] vs. AC‐pattern: 1/21 [5%], p = .02, mid‐intramural scar; CA‐pattern: 15/38 [39%] vs. AC‐pattern: 1/21 [5%], p = .005). Conclusions: The spatial pattern of endocardial PM in SHD‐related VT directly correlates with scar topography. AC‐pattern is associated with endocardial dominant scar on ICE with lower scar ratio and longer stimulus‐QRS intervals, whereas CA‐pattern is strongly associated with epicardial dominant or mid‐intramural scar with higher scar ratio and shorter stimulus‐QRS intervals.