A qualitative study of stakeholder and researcher perspectives of community engagement practices for HIV vaccine clinical trials in South Africa. Issue 3 (7th November 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Dietrich, Janan J.; Munoz, Jessica; Tshabalala, Gugulethu; Makhale, Lerato M.; Hornschuh, Stefanie; Rentas, Francisco; Mulaudzi, Mamakiri; Laher, Fatima; Andrasik, Michele P.
• Is Part Of: Journal of community psychology. Volume 51:Issue 3(2023)
• Page Start: 998
• Page End: 1015
• Publication Date: 2022-11-07
• Subjects: CAB -- Community Advisory Boards -- community engagement -- HIV -- HVTN -- South Africa -- vaccine trials; Clinical psychology -- Periodicals; Social psychiatry -- Periodicals; Community Mental Health Services -- Periodicals; 362.2205
• DOI: 10.1002/jcop.22951
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0090-4392

Abstract

Abstract: Community engagement increases community trust of research and improves trial participation. However, there is limited documented appraisal of community engagement practices. Several HIV vaccine efficacy trials have been conducted in South Africa, the country most affected by HIV, predominantly in collaboration with the HIV Vaccine Trials Network (HVTN). We explored stakeholder and researcher perspectives of the HVTN community engagement practices used in the Gauteng province of South Africa. In 2017, we conducted a qualitative study. Using semi‐structured interview guides, we facilitated two group discussions with Community Advisory Board (CAB) members ( n = 13), and 14 in‐depth interviews with HVTN‐affiliated employees ( n = 8 in South Africa and n = 6 in the USA). Group discussions and in‐depth interviews were audio‐recorded, transcribed verbatim, translated into English, and coded using NVIVO 12 Plus software for thematic data analysis. Overall, median age of study participants was 22 (interquartile range 32–54) years, and 74% ( n = 20) were female. Three main themes about community engagement emerged: (i) community engagement as an ongoing iterative relationship between researchers and community; (ii) methods of community engagement, encompassing community education by linking with external stakeholders and through awareness campaigns by pamphlet distribution and mass events, working with communities to develop recruitment messages, and working with CAB as a link to communities; and (iii) strategies to improve community engagement, for example, using simple language, linking with religious leaders and traditional healers, and communicating via conventional (newspapers, television, and radio) and social (videos and listicles) media. Our data indicate ways for researchers to improve relationships with community by understanding local needs, strengthening collaborations, and tailoring communication strategies. In this regard, CABs signify critical linkages between researchers and communities. CABs can relay relevant health research needs, advise on the creation of suitable materials, and link researchers more effectively with community leaders and media.