Access to novel drugs and therapeutics for children and youth: Eliciting citizens' values to inform public funding decisions. (14th January 2023)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Gauvreau, Cindy L.; Wight, Lisa; Subasri, Mathushan; Palmer, Antonia; Hayeems, Robin; Croker, Alysha; Abelson, Julia; Fraser, Brent; Bombard, Yvonne; Moore Hepburn, Charlotte; Wilson, Michael G.; Denburg, Avram
• Is Part Of: Health expectations. Volume 26:Number 2(2023)
• Page Start: 715
• Page End: 727
• Publication Date: 2023-01-14
• Subjects: access to novel drugs -- children and youth -- citizens' values -- deliberative public engagement -- health technology assessment -- public funding decisions; Medical policy -- Periodicals; Public health -- Periodicals; Health planning -- Periodicals; 362.105
• DOI: 10.1111/hex.13697
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1369-6513

Abstract

Abstract: Introduction: The unique evidentiary, economic and ethical challenges associated with health technology assessment (HTA) of precision therapies limit access to novel drugs and therapeutics for children and youth, for whom such challenges are amplified. We elicited citizens' perspectives about values‐based criteria relevant to the assessment of paediatric precision therapies to inform the development of a child‐tailored HTA framework. Methods: We held four citizen panels virtually in May–June 2021, informed by a plain‐language citizen brief summarizing global and local evidence about the challenges, policy and programmatic options and implementation strategies related to enhancing access to precision therapies for Canadian children and youth. Panellists were recruited through a nationally representative database, medical/patient networks and social media. We inductively coded and thematically analysed panel transcripts to generate themes and identify priority values. Results: The perspectives of panellists ( n = 45) coalesced into four overlapping themes, with attendant subthemes, relevant to a child‐tailored HTA framework: (1) Childhood Distinctions: vulnerability, 'fair innings', future potential, family impacts; (2) Voice: agency of children and youth; lived versus no lived experience; (3) One versus Many: disease severity, rarity, equity, unmet need and (4) Health System Governance: funding, implementation inequities, effectiveness and safety. Participants broadly agreed that childhood distinctions, particularly family impacts, justify child‐tailored HTA. Dissent arose over whose voice should inform HTA and how such perspectives are best incorporated. Conclusions: Citizens can offer unique insights into criteria relevant to the development or revision of HTA frameworks to capture holistic, societally responsive dimensions of value attached to unique contexts or populations, including children. Balancing the hopes and expectations of patients and caregivers for access to expensive but potential life‐altering therapies against the opportunity costs borne by encompassing health systems is a fundamental challenge that will require rigorous methods to elicit, weigh and reconcile varied views. Patient or Public Contribution: A patient advocate served on the steering committee of this study and co‐authored this article. Key informants for the Citizen Brief included patient advocates and caregivers; a separate patient advocate reviewed the Brief before dissemination. Qualitative and quantitative data were collected from the general public and caregivers of children, with written consent.