Effects of hydropeaking on drift, stranding and community composition of macroinvertebrates: A field experimental approach in three regulated Swiss rivers. (21st June 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Tonolla, Diego; Dossi, Florian; Kastenhofer, Olivier; Doering, Michael; Hauer, Christoph; Graf, Wolfram; Schülting, Lisa
• Other Names: Vanzo Davide guestEditor.; Bejarano María Dolores guestEditor.; Boavida Isabel guestEditor.; Carolli Mauro guestEditor.; Venus Terese E. guestEditor.; Casas‐Mulet Roser guestEditor.
• Is Part Of: River research and applications. Volume 39:Number 3(2023)
• Page Start: 427
• Page End: 443
• Publication Date: 2022-06-21
• Subjects: Alpine Rivers -- altered flow regime -- aquatic invertebrates -- benthos -- environmental flow -- flow fluctuation -- flow manipulation -- hydropower impacts; Rivers -- Regulation -- Periodicals; Rivers -- Periodicals; 551.483
• DOI: 10.1002/rra.4019
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1535-1459

Abstract

Abstract: Hydropeaking operation leads to fluctuations in wetted area between base and peak flow and increases discharge‐related hydraulic forces (e.g. flow velocity). These processes promote macroinvertebrate drift and stranding, often affecting benthic abundance and biomass. Our field experimental study—conducted in three hydropeaking‐regulated Swiss rivers—aimed to quantify (a) the short‐term effects of the combined increase in flow amplitude and up‐ramping rate based on macroinvertebrate drift and stranding, as well as (b) long‐term effects based on the established community composition. Hydropeaking led to increased macroinvertebrate drift compared to base flow and to unaffected residual flow reaches. Moreover, stranding of macroinvertebrates was positively related to drift, especially during the up‐ramping phase. Flow velocity and up‐ramping rate were identified as major determinants for macroinvertebrate drift, while flow ratio and down‐ramping rate for stranding. Particularly high sensitivity towards hydropeaking was found for Limnephilidae, whereas Heptageniidae seemed to be resistant in respect to short‐ and long‐term hydropeaking effects. In the long‐term, hydropeaking did not considerably reduce benthic density of most taxa, especially of some highly resistant and resilient taxa such as Chironomidae and Baetidae, which dominated the community composition even though they showed comparably high drift and stranding responses. Therefore, we argue that high drift and/or stranding, especially of individual‐rich taxa, does not necessarily indicate strong hydropeaking sensitivity. Finally, our results demonstrate the necessity to consider the differences in river‐specific morphological complexity and hydropeaking intensity, since these factors strongly influence the community composition and short‐term drift and stranding response of macroinvertebrates to hydropower pressure.