Called to repair injustice: Connecting everyday practices to societal phenomena, creating momentum for solidarity and change. Issue 1 (21st December 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Weingarten, Kaethe
• Is Part Of: Family process. Volume 62:Issue 1(2023)
• Page Start: 6
• Page End: 34
• Publication Date: 2022-12-21
• Subjects: allyship -- empathic repair -- ethical loneliness -- implicated subject -- witnessing; Family psychotherapy -- Periodicals; Families -- Periodicals; 616.8915
• DOI: 10.1111/famp.12839
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0014-7370

Abstract

Abstract: I have been working with a model of witnessing for more than 30 years (Weingarten, 2000a). In this article, I add layers to its conceptualization by discussing several related concepts: the implicated subject (Rothberg, 2019) and ethical loneliness (Stauffer, 2015) among them. What distinguishes the Witnessing Model positions from the implicated subject is that the implicated subject is always aligned with power and/or domination, whereas a witness may not be. Certain responsibilities accrue if we take our implication seriously. Just as I have suggested there are steps one can take from positions two, three and four of the Witnessing Model to enter, return or remain in the aware and empowered position, a position from within which accountability is more likely, I offer ideas about how one can respond accountably when one acknowledges one's implication. Throughout this article, I raise questions, some of which I cannot answer. For instance, can empathic repair be undertaken by one party to a ruptured relationship, one segment of a society, without an unfolding process of mutual recognition and compassion? The contemporary moment in which we are living presents us with dire outcomes if the answer is "no." The entire article is an extended meditation on the following central question: How can we, implicated subjects, practice solidarity to diminish ethical loneliness and create movement toward the personal, interpersonal and structural changes necessary to address the truths that our implication entails?