Treatment and Prevention of Periprosthetic Capsular Contracture in Breast Surgery With Prosthesis Using Leukotriene Receptor Antagonists: A Meta-Analysis. (7th October 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Treatment and Prevention of Periprosthetic Capsular Contracture in Breast Surgery With Prosthesis Using Leukotriene Receptor Antagonists: A Meta-Analysis. (7th October 2021)
- Main Title:
- Treatment and Prevention of Periprosthetic Capsular Contracture in Breast Surgery With Prosthesis Using Leukotriene Receptor Antagonists: A Meta-Analysis
- Authors:
- Pașca, Andrei
Bonci, Eduard-Alexandru
Chiuzan, Codruța
Jiboc, Nicoleta Monica
Gâta, Vlad Alexandru
Muntean, Maximilian Vlad
Matei, Ileana Rodica
Achimaș-Cadariu, Patriciu Andrei - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: Capsular contracture (CC) is the most common long-term complication of breast surgery with prosthesis. Leukotriene receptor antagonists (LRAs) have been tested as a potential treatment; however, mixed results have been observed. Objectives: The aim of this study was to undertake a meta-analysis to clarify the treatment and prophylactic capabilities of LRAs in the management of CC. Methods: A systematic literature search of the most popular English-language databases was performed to identify relevant primary publications. We included all studies that used the Baker scale to evaluate the treatment and preventive capabilities of LRAs. Results: Six eligible studies were included based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, totalling 2276 breasts, of which 775 did not receive LRAs and 1501 did. Final pooled results showed that LRAs could help manage CC with a risk difference (RD) of –0.38 with a corresponding 95% CI of –0.69 to –0.08, showing statistical significance at a Z value of 2.48, P = 0.01. Subgroup analysis based on the type of drug showed that only montelukast yielded statistical significance (RD = –0.27, 95% CI = –0.51 to –0.03, Z = 2.20, P = 0.03). Zafirlukast did not seem to influence CC. Further subgroup analysis based on treatment timing showed that prophylaxis was ineffective and only treatment for ongoing CC yielded statistically significant improvements. Conclusions: The current meta-analysis proved that LRAs could be used inAbstract: Background: Capsular contracture (CC) is the most common long-term complication of breast surgery with prosthesis. Leukotriene receptor antagonists (LRAs) have been tested as a potential treatment; however, mixed results have been observed. Objectives: The aim of this study was to undertake a meta-analysis to clarify the treatment and prophylactic capabilities of LRAs in the management of CC. Methods: A systematic literature search of the most popular English-language databases was performed to identify relevant primary publications. We included all studies that used the Baker scale to evaluate the treatment and preventive capabilities of LRAs. Results: Six eligible studies were included based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, totalling 2276 breasts, of which 775 did not receive LRAs and 1501 did. Final pooled results showed that LRAs could help manage CC with a risk difference (RD) of –0.38 with a corresponding 95% CI of –0.69 to –0.08, showing statistical significance at a Z value of 2.48, P = 0.01. Subgroup analysis based on the type of drug showed that only montelukast yielded statistical significance (RD = –0.27, 95% CI = –0.51 to –0.03, Z = 2.20, P = 0.03). Zafirlukast did not seem to influence CC. Further subgroup analysis based on treatment timing showed that prophylaxis was ineffective and only treatment for ongoing CC yielded statistically significant improvements. Conclusions: The current meta-analysis proved that LRAs could be used in the management of CC. Only treatment for ongoing CC showed statistically significant improvements. Montelukast seemed to be more efficient with a safer profile for adverse effects, whereas zafirlukast yielded no statistically significant results. Level of Evidence: 4: … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Aesthetic surgery journal. Volume 42:Number 5(2022)
- Journal:
- Aesthetic surgery journal
- Issue:
- Volume 42:Number 5(2022)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 42, Issue 5 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 42
- Issue:
- 5
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0042-0005-0000
- Page Start:
- 483
- Page End:
- 494
- Publication Date:
- 2021-10-07
- Subjects:
- Surgery, Plastic -- Periodicals
617.95 - Journal URLs:
- http://asj.oxfordjournals.org/content/ ↗
http://aes.sagepub.com/content/by/year ↗
http://www.mosby.com/aesthetic ↗
http://online.sagepub.com/ ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/1090820X ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1093/asj/sjab355 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1090-820X
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 0730.384000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 26301.xml