Ideal proportion of the population to be patch tested: How many should we be doing?. (10th September 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Mughal, Avad A.; Lowe, Ashima; Hadjieconomou, Sofia; Bhoyrul, Bevin; Chu, Anthony; Cooper, Sue M.; Divekar, Preshita; Hill, Glenda; Holden, Catherine R.; Johnston, Graham A.; Sabroe, Ruth A.; Scharrer, Krisztina; Stone, Natalie; Usmani, Naila; Wilkinson, Stephen M.
• Is Part Of: Contact dermatitis. Volume 85:Number 6(2021)
• Page Start: 693
• Page End: 697
• Publication Date: 2021-09-10
• Subjects: contact dermatitis -- cutaneous allergy -- patch testing -- population -- service evaluation; Contact dermatitis -- Periodicals; 616.51
• DOI: 10.1111/cod.13957
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0105-1873

Abstract

Abstract: Background: How many patients should we be patch testing? A previous study suggested that the minimum proportion of a population to be patch tested for allergic contact dermatitis was 1:700 annually. Objectives: To evaluate if the current minimum rate for patch testing has changed over the 20 years since the previous study in order to maximize the value. Methods: In cooperation with the British Society for Cutaneous Allergy, a proforma for collation of retrospective data between January 2015 and December 2017 was sent to patch‐test centers in the United Kingdom (UK) and the Republic of Ireland (ROI). The number of positive tests was analyzed against the proportion of population tested to see what proportion of the population would yield the greatest number of positive results. Results: Responses from 11 centers showed that the minimum number needed to patch test had increased to 1:550 per head of population per year using the current criteria. Conclusions: In agreement with previous studies, we should be patch testing more people than we are. We could reduce the threshold for referral of patients we patch test to derive the most benefit from this investigation. Abstract : Nobody is patch testing enough Studies have shown that the 1:700 per population target was not being achieved. More patch testing is needed This study shows that 1:550 annually is a more up to date figure. We should look at numbers for patch testing differently The rate of positivity may not be the correct way of looking at this. Perhaps we should apply the screening model.