Clinical Evaluation of the Osteoporotic Fracture Treatment Score (OF-Score): Results of the Evaluation of the Osteoporotic Fracture Classification, Treatment Score and Therapy Recommendations (EOFTT) Study. Issue 1 (April 2023)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ullrich, Bernhard W.; Schnake, Klaus John; Schenk, Philipp; Katscher, Sebastian; Bäumlein, Martin; Zimmermann, Volker; Schwarz, Falko; Schmeiser, Gregor; Scherer, Michael; Müller, Michael; Sprengel, Kai; Liepold, Katja; Schramm, Simon; Baron, Hagen-Christopher; Siekmann, Holger; Franck, Alexander; Scheyerer, Max J.; Kirtas, Seyma; Spiegl, Ulrich J. A.; Osterhoff, Georg
• Other Names: Schnake Klaus John guest-editor.
• Is Part Of: Global spine journal. Volume 13:Issue 1(2023)Supplement
• Page Start: 29S
• Page End: 35S
• Publication Date: 2023-04
• Subjects: osteoporosis -- treatment -- vertebral fracture -- operative -- OF classification; Spine -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Spine -- Diseases -- Treatment -- Periodicals; Spine -- Abnormalities -- Periodicals; Spine -- Surgery -- Periodicals; 616.73
• DOI: 10.1177/21925682221148133
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2192-5682

Abstract

Study Design: Multicenter prospective cohort study. Objective: The study aims to validate the recently developed OF score for treatment decisions in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF). Methods: This is a prospective multicenter cohort study (EOFTT) in 17 spine centers. All consecutive patients with OVCF were included. The decision for conservative or surgical therapy was made by the treating physician independent of the OF score recommendation. Final decisions were compared to the recommendations given by the OF score. Outcome parameters were complications, Visual Analogue Scale, Oswestry Disability Questionnaire, Timed Up & Go test, EQ-5D 5 L, and Barthel Index. Results: In total, 518 patients (75.3% female, age 75 ± 10) years were included. 344 (66%) patients received surgical treatment. 71% of patients were treated following the score recommendations. For an OF score cut-off value of 6.5, the sensitivity and specificity to predict actual treatment were 60% and 68% (AUC .684, P < .001). During hospitalization overall 76 (14.7%) complications occurred. The mean follow-up rate and time were 92% and 5 ± 3.5 months, respectively. While all patients in the study cohort improved in clinical outcome parameters, the effect size was significantly less in the patients not treated in line with the OF score's recommendation. Eight (3%) patients needed revision surgery. Conclusions: Patients treated according to the OF score's recommendations showed favorable short-term clinical results. Noncompliance with the score resulted in more pain and impaired functional outcome and quality of life. The OF score is a reliable and save tool to aid treatment decision in OVCF.