Maximum levels of cross‐contamination for 24 antimicrobial active substances in non‐target feed. Part 1: Methodology, general data gaps and uncertainties. (26th October 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Koutsoumanis, Konstantinos; Allende, Ana; Alvarez‐Ordóñez, Avelino; Bolton, Declan; Bover‐Cid, Sara; Chemaly, Marianne; Davies, Robert; De Cesare, Alessandra; Herman, Lieve; Hilbert, Friederike; Lindqvist, Roland; Nauta, Maarten; Ru, Giuseppe; Simmons, Marion; Skandamis, Panagiotis; Suffredini, Elisabetta; Andersson, Dan I; Bampidis, Vasileios; Bengtsson‐Palme, Johan; Bouchard, Damien; Ferran, Aude; Kouba, Maryline; López Puente, Secundino; López‐Alonso, Marta; Nielsen, Søren Saxmose; Pechová, Alena; Petkova, Mariana; Girault, Sebastien; Broglia, Alessandro; Guerra, Beatriz; Innocenti, Matteo Lorenzo; Liébana, Ernesto; López‐Gálvez, Gloria; Manini, Paola; Stella, Pietro; Peixe, Luisa;
• Is Part Of: EFSA journal. Volume 19:Number 10(2021)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2021-10-26
• Subjects: antimicrobial resistance -- antimicrobial resistance selection concentration (FARSC) -- minimal selective concentration (MSC) -- sub‐inhibitory concentration -- growth promotion -- yield increase -- food‐producing animals; Food -- Europe -- Safety measures -- Periodicals; Food Safety; Food -- Safety measures; Europe; Periodicals; Periodicals; Fulltext; Government Publications, International; Internet Resources; Periodicals; Periodicals; 363.19209405
• DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6852
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1831-4732

Abstract

Abstract: The European Commission requested EFSA to assess, in collaboration with EMA, the specific concentrations of antimicrobials resulting from cross‐contamination in non‐target feed for food‐producing animals below which there would not be an effect on the emergence of, and/or selection for, resistance in microbial agents relevant for human and animal health, as well as the levels of the antimicrobials which could have a growth promotion/increase yield effect. The assessment was performed for 24 antimicrobial active substances, as specified in the mandate. This scientific opinion describes the methodology used, and the main associated data gaps and uncertainties. To estimate the antimicrobial levels in the non‐target feed that would not result in emergence of, and/or selection for, resistance, a model was developed. This 'Feed Antimicrobial Resistance Selection Concentration' (FARSC) model is based on the minimal selective concentration (MSC), or the predicted MSC (PMSC) if MSC for the most susceptible bacterial species is unavailable, the fraction of antimicrobial dose available for exposure to microorganisms in the large intestine or rumen (considering pharmacokinetic parameters), the daily faecal output or rumen volume and the daily feed intake. Currently, lack of data prevents the establishment of PMSC and/or FARSC for several antimicrobials and animal species. To address growth promotion, data from an extensive literature search were used. Specific assessments of the different substances grouped by antimicrobial classes are addressed in separate scientific opinions. General conclusions and recommendations were made.