Opinion on the impact of non‐monotonic dose responses on EFSA′s human health risk assessments. (20th October 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: More, Simon; Benford, Diane; Hougaard Bennekou, Susanne; Bampidis, Vasileios; Bragard, Claude; Halldorsson, Thorhallur; Hernandez‐Jerez, Antonio; Koutsoumanis, Kostas; Lambré, Claude; Machera, Kyriaki; Mullins, Ewen; Nielsen, Søren Saxmose; Schlatter, Josef; Schrenk, Dieter; Turck, Dominique; Tarazona, Jose; Younes, Maged
• Is Part Of: EFSA journal. Volume 19:Number 10(2021)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2021-10-20
• Subjects: non‐monotonic dose response (NMDR) -- statistical analysis -- probabilistic analysis -- biological relevance -- reference dose -- human health risk assessment; Food -- Europe -- Safety measures -- Periodicals; Food Safety; Food -- Safety measures; Europe; Periodicals; Periodicals; Fulltext; Government Publications, International; Internet Resources; Periodicals; Periodicals; 363.19209405
• DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6877
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1831-4732

Abstract

Abstract: This Opinion assesses the biological relevance of the non‐monotonic dose responses (NMDR) identified in a previous EFSA External Report (Beausoleil et al., 2016) produced under GP/EFSA/SCER/2014/01 and the follow‐up probabilistic assessment (Chevillotte et al., 2017a, b), focusing on the in vivo data sets fulfilling most of the checkpoints of the visual/statistical‐based analysis identified in Beausoleil et al. (2016). The evaluation was completed with cases discussed in EFSA assessments and the update of the scientific literature. Observations of NMDR were confirmed in certain studies and are particularly relevant for receptor‐mediated effects. Based on the results of the evaluation, the Opinion proposes an approach to be applied during the risk assessment process when apparent non‐monotonicity is observed, also providing advice on specific elements to be considered to facilitate the assessment of NMDR in EFSA risk assessments. The proposed approach was applied to two case studies, Bisphenol A and bis(2‐ethylhexyl phthalate (DEHP) and these evaluations are reported in dedicated annexes. Considering the potential impact of NMDRs in regulatory risk assessment, the Scientific Committee recommends a concerted international effort on developing internationally agreed guidance and harmonised frameworks for identifying and addressing NMDRs in the risk assessment process. Abstract : This publication is linked to the following EFSA Supporting Publications article: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/sp.efsa.2021.EN-6878/full