Safety and Efficacy of Adult Stem Cell Therapy for Acute Myocardial Infarction and Ischemic Heart Failure (SafeCell Heart): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. (26th September 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Lalu, Manoj M.; Mazzarello, Sasha; Zlepnig, Jennifer; Dong, Yuan Yi (Ryan); Montroy, Joshua; McIntyre, Lauralyn; Devereaux, P.J.; Stewart, Duncan J.; David Mazer, C.; Barron, Carly C.; McIsaac, Daniel I.; Fergusson, Dean A.
• Is Part Of: Stem cells translational medicine. Volume 7:Number 12(2018)
• Page Start: 857
• Page End: 866
• Publication Date: 2018-09-26
• Subjects: Stem cells -- Myocardial infarction -- Myocardial ischemia -- Systematic review; Stem cells -- Periodicals; Regenerative medicine -- Periodicals; Periodicals; 616.0277405
• DOI: 10.1002/sctm.18-0120
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2157-6564

Abstract

Abstract : Preclinical and clinical evidence suggests that mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) may be beneficial in treating both acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and ischemic heart failure (IHF). However, the safety profile and efficacy of MSC therapy is not well-known. We conducted a systematic review of clinical trials that evaluated the safety or efficacy of MSCs for AMI or IHF. Embase, PubMed/Medline, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from inception to September 27, 2017. Studies that examined the use of MSCs administered to adults with AMI or IHF were eligible. The Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to assess bias of included studies. The primary outcome was safety assessed by adverse events and the secondary outcome was efficacy which was assessed by mortality and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). A total of 668 citations were reviewed and 23 studies met eligibility criteria. Of these, 11 studies evaluated AMI and 12 studies evaluated IHF. There was no association between MSCs and acute adverse events. There was a significant improvement in overall LVEF in patients who received MSCs (SMD 0.73, 95% CI 0.24–1.21). No significant difference in mortality was noted (Peto OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.38–1.22). Results from our systematic review suggest that MSC therapy for ischemic heart disease appears to be safe. There is a need for a well-designed adequately powered randomized control trial (with rigorous adverse event reporting and evaluations of cardiac function) to further establish a clear risk-benefit profile of MSCs.