Building ecological networks with local ecological knowledge in hyper‐diverse and logistically challenging ecosystems. Issue 10 (13th August 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ong, Lisa; Campos‐Arceiz, Ahimsa; Loke, Vivienne P. W.; Pura, Param bin; Tunil, Charang Muhamad Tauhid bin; Din, Husin Sudin A/L; Angah, Rizuan bin; Amirrudin, Nurul Ain binti; Tan, Wei Harn; Lily, Ong; Solana‐Mena, Alicia; McConkey, Kim R.
• Is Part Of: Methods in ecology and evolution. Volume 12:Issue 10(2021)
• Page Start: 2042
• Page End: 2053
• Publication Date: 2021-08-13
• Subjects: frugivory -- hyper‐diverse ecosystem -- indigenous communities -- local ecological knowledge -- mutualistic interactions -- seed dispersal network -- traditional knowledge -- tropical rainforest; Ecology -- Periodicals; Evolution -- Periodicals; 577
• DOI: 10.1111/2041-210X.13685
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2041-210X

Abstract

Abstract: Collecting interaction data to build frugivory or seed dispersal networks is logistically challenging in ecosystems that have very high plant and animal diversity and/or where fieldwork is difficult or dangerous. Consequently, the majority of available networks are from ecosystems with low species diversity or they represent a subset of the community. Here, we propose an approach applying local ecological knowledge (LEK) of indigenous communities to build quantitative interaction databases and networks that would otherwise be difficult to achieve with direct observations. Indigenous communities live in many hyper‐diverse ecosystems and the people within these communities often have detailed knowledge of ecological processes. Working in a Sundaland biodiversity hotspot—Royal Belum State Park, Peninsular Malaysia—we used visually oriented interviews with indigenous people (Orang Asli, in the Jahai and Temiar ethnic subgroups), field data and published records to collate interactions, and their estimated frequency of occurrence, of animal fruit consumption and seed dispersal. We documented 2, 063 fruit consumption and 1, 360 seed dispersal interactions among 164 plant species and 34 animal taxa, the latter representing groups of closely related species or individual species. The majority of the interactions (97%) were identified by the LEK interviews, with the additional methods (field data and published records) used to support and marginally expand the interview data. The metrics for the networks we built reflect those of networks structured by biological mechanisms, supporting the validity of our novel approach. LEK is highly relevant for building detailed databases for ecological interactions in hyper‐diverse and/or challenging ecosystems. Such ecosystems are among the most vulnerable on earth, harbouring ecological interactions that are often poorly documented at a community level. We show how LEK can broaden our knowledge of such sensitive ecosystems, but our approach is useful for any ecosystem in which people hold rich LEK.