Incorporating Posterior‐Informed Approximation Errors Into a Hierarchical Framework to Facilitate Out‐of‐the‐Box MCMC Sampling for Geothermal Inverse Problems and Uncertainty Quantification. Issue 1 (15th January 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Maclaren, Oliver J.; Nicholson, Ruanui; Bjarkason, Elvar K.; O'Sullivan, John P.; O'Sullivan, Michael J.
• Is Part Of: Water resources research. Volume 56:Issue 1(2020)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2020-01-15
• Subjects: inverse problems -- Bayesian -- MCMC -- approximation error -- geothermal -- hierarchical; Hydrology -- Periodicals; 333.91
• DOI: 10.1029/2018WR024240
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0043-1397

Abstract

Abstract: We consider geothermal inverse problems and uncertainty quantification from a Bayesian perspective. Our main goal is to make standard, "out‐of‐the‐box" Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling more feasible for complex simulation models by using suitable approximations. To do this, we first show how to pose both the inverse and prediction problems in a hierarchical Bayesian framework. We then show how to incorporate so‐called posterior‐informed model approximation error into this hierarchical framework, using a modified form of the Bayesian approximation error approach. This enables the use of a "coarse, " approximate model in place of a finer, more expensive model, while accounting for the additional uncertainty and potential bias that this can introduce. Our method requires only simple probability modeling, a relatively small number of fine model simulations and only modifies the target posterior—any standard MCMC sampling algorithm can be used to sample the new posterior. These corrections can also be used in methods that are not based on MCMC sampling. We show that our approach can achieve significant computational speedups on two geothermal test problems. We also demonstrate the dangers of naively using coarse, approximate models in place of finer models, without accounting for the induced approximation errors. The naive approach tends to give overly confident and biased posteriors while incorporating Bayesian approximation error into our hierarchical framework corrects for this while maintaining computational efficiency and ease of use. Key Points: We consider geothermal inverse problems and uncertainty quantification from a Bayesian perspective We present a simple method for incorporating posterior‐informed approximation errors into a hierarchical Bayesian framework Our method makes standard out‐of‐the‐box MCMC sampling feasible for more complex models while correcting for bias and overconfidence