Arctic Snow Depth and Sea Ice Thickness From ICESat‐2 and CryoSat‐2 Freeboards: A First Examination. Issue 3 (21st March 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kwok, R.; Kacimi, S.; Webster, M.A.; Kurtz, N.T.; Petty, A.A.
• Is Part Of: Journal of geophysical research. Volume 125:Issue 3(2020)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2020-03-21
• Subjects: Arctic Ocean -- CryoSat‐2 -- ICESat‐2 -- sea ice -- snow depth -- thickness; Oceanography -- Periodicals; 551.4605
• DOI: 10.1029/2019JC016008
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2169-9275

Abstract

Abstract: We present a first examination of Arctic sea ice snow depth estimates from differencing satellite lidar (ICESat‐2) and radar (CryoSat‐2) freeboards. These estimates cover the period between 14 October 2018 and the end of April 2019. Snow depth is related to freeboard differences by the refractive index/bulk density of the snow layer—the only free parameter in the approach. Area‐averaged snow depth ranges from 9 cm (on first‐year ice: 5 cm, multiyear ice: 14 cm) in late October to 19 cm (first‐year ice: 17 cm, multiyear ice: 27 cm) in April; on average, this snow is thinner over FYI. Spatial patterns and gradients of snow depth estimates compare well with reconstructions using snowfall from ERA‐Interim and ERA5, although snowfall from ERA5 is systematically higher. For all months, the results suggest that ~50% of the total freeboard is comprised of snow. Retrievals are within a few centimeters of snow depth data acquired by Operation IceBridge in April 2019. Sources of uncertainties associated with this freeboard‐differencing approach are discussed. Further, sea ice thicknesses calculated using the retrieved snow depth and a modified climatology are contrasted. Comparatively, the snow depth and calculated ice thickness using a modified climatology are higher by ~5 cm and 0.33 m, although these differences are not uniform throughout the season. Snow accumulation was slower between October and December but increased between December and January, unlike the modified climatology, which exhibited a monotonic accumulation for all months. Future opportunities for assessment and improvement of these estimates are discussed. Plain Language Summary: The snow layer atop Arctic sea ice is an important component of the climate system. In winter, the insulating effects of snow slow the rate of ice growth. In spring, the onset of ice surface melt is delayed until the highly reflective snow layer disappears. During summer, meltwater from snow collects in depressions to form melt ponds, which enhances the absorption of solar radiation leading to more rapid surface warming. Presently, there are no routine measurements of snow depth suitable for assessing the impact of climate changes on the precipitation and accumulation of snow on sea ice. Our current understanding of snow depth is limited and has been based on field measurements conducted in the middle of last century and from airborne surveys conducted over the last decade. In this paper, we combine the measurements from two altimetry missions (ICESat‐2 and CryoSat‐2) to calculate snow depth over the entire Arctic Ocean. ICESat‐2 (a lidar) and CryoSat‐2 (a radar) measure the heights to the top and bottom of the snow layer, respectively. Differencing the two heights provides an estimate of the thickness of the snow layer. This paper describes this novel approach and an assessment of the snow depth estimates. Key Points: Our current understanding of snow depth is based largely on climatology developed during last century and from recent airborne surveys We present a first examination of Arctic sea ice snow depth estimates from differencing satellite ICESat‐2 and CryoSat‐2 freeboards Sea ice thickness can now be calculated with snow loading from satellite retrievals without resorting to climatology or reconstructions