An Investigation Into Biases in Instantaneous Aerosol Radiative Effects Calculated by Shortwave Parameterizations in Two Earth System Models. Issue 11 (1st June 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Freidenreich, S.; Paynter, D.; Lin, P.; Ramaswamy, V.; Jones, A. L.; Feldman, D.; Collins, W. D.
• Is Part Of: Journal of geophysical research. Volume 126:Issue 11(2021)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2021-06-01
• Subjects: Atmospheric physics -- Periodicals; Geophysics -- Periodicals; 551.5
• DOI: 10.1029/2019JD032323
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2169-897X

Abstract

Abstract: Because the forcings to which Coupled Model Intercomparison Project ‐ Phase 5 (CMIP5) models were subjected were poorly quantified, recent efforts from the Radiative Forcing Model Intercomparison Project (RFMIP) have focused on developing and testing models with exacting benchmarks. Here, we focus on aerosol forcing to understand if for a given distribution of aerosols, participating models are producing a radiometrically‐accurate forcing. We apply the RFMIP experimental protocol for assessing flux biases in aerosol instantaneous radiative effect (IRE) on two participating models, GFDL AM4 and CESM 1.2.2. The latter model contains the RRTMG radiation code which is widely used among CMIP6 GCM's. We conduct a series of calculations that test different potential sources of error in these models relative to line‐by‐line benchmarks. We find two primary sources of error: two‐stream solution methods and the techniques to resolve spectral dependencies of absorption and scattering across the solar spectrum. The former is the dominant source of error for both models but the latter is more significant as a contributing factor for CESM 1.2.2. Either source of error can be addressed in future model development, and these results both demonstrate how the RFMIP protocol can help determine the origins of parameterized errors relative to their equivalent benchmark calculations for participating models, as well as highlight a viable path towards a more rigorous quantification and control of forcings for future CMIP exercises. Key Points: Using radiative forcing model intercomparison project (RFMIP's) protocol to assess biases in aerosol instantaneous radiative effect (IRE), contrasting sources of error found between the GFDL AM4 and RRTMG CESM 1.2.2 models Two sources of error in modeled IRE relative to benchmarks are: scattering methods and spectral resolution of shortwave parameterizations Results demonstrate how the RFMIP protocol can help determine the origins of model biases in aerosol IRE for other participating models