Antimicrobial silver dressings: a review of emerging issues for modern wound care. Issue 3 (21st November 2021) - May, Andrew
Abstract: Skin is an important barrier to pathogenic microorganisms and plays a critical role in a ctivation of innate immune responses. When the skin barrier is breached following wounding or burn injury, pathogens can invade and complicate healing with infection resulting in delayed healing and symptomatic scarring. Wound infection is a significant problem after burn injury and in patients with chronic wounds. Antimicrobial silver has had a significant role in wound antisepsis throughout history and, given the rise in community acquired antibiotic resistance, silver dressings are now commonly used to combat wound infection. The multi‐modal mechanism of action, low potential for toxicity and formation of microbial resistance makes silver dressings suitable tools against a wide array of clinically important microbes. There are, however, a number of issues with silver dressings including a conflicting evidence base, the important environmental consideration of nanoparticle manufacture, and the significant cost of these products. One solution may be to adopt an 'opened‐but‐unused' means of wound care whereby bulk dressing materials are used piecemeal and stored in between dressing changes to increase the cost‐effectiveness and reduced wastage. There is, however, little literature on this topic and so in vitro and clinical research must be performed to consider the efficacy of active ingredient dressings in wound care including silver dressings once opened and stored. Abstract : Silver dressings inhibit microbial growth in wounds via many different modes of action and may facilitate faster healing. There are, however, several issues with silver dressings including a conflicting evidence base with a lack of high‐quality clinical trials, an important environmental consideration of silver nanoparticle manufacture, and a significant fiscal expense without clearly demonstrated cost‐effectiveness. In this article we review these issues and explore a potential solution to minimize them by adopting an 'opened‐but‐unused' model of burn wound care.