Immediate implant placement combining socket seal abutment and peri‐implant socket filling: A prospective case series. Issue 1 (22nd October 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Lilet, Romane; Desiron, Martin; Finelle, Gary; Lecloux, Geoffrey; Seidel, Laurence; Lambert, France
• Is Part Of: Clinical oral implants research. Volume 33:Issue 1(2022)
• Page Start: 33
• Page End: 44
• Publication Date: 2021-10-22
• Subjects: biomaterials -- bone substitutes -- dental implants -- humans -- prospective studies -- survival rates -- tooth extractions -- tooth socket; Dental implants -- Research -- Periodicals; 617.69
• DOI: 10.1111/clr.13852
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0905-7161

Abstract

Abstract: Objectives: The aim of this prospective case series was to assess the implant outcomes as well as hard and soft tissue dimensional changes of immediate implant placement in posterior sites using a custom‐made sealing socket abutment (SSA) combined to peri‐implant socket filling (PISF). Material and methods: Twenty patients were considered for single extraction and immediate implant in upper or lower posterior regions. The remaining peri‐implant sockets were filled with Deproteinized Bovine Bone Mineral. Based on intra‐oral scans (IOS), custom‐made SSAs were placed the same day. Implant survival rate, peri‐implant bone changes, peri‐implant health and pink esthetic score (PES) were recorded up to 1 year post‐implant placement. Moreover, CBCT and IOS were performed to monitor hard and soft tissue dimensional changes. Results: One implant failed to osseointegrate leading to an implant survival rate of 95% after 1 year. Peri‐implant bone changes yielded 0.19 ± 0.31 mm and 84.2% of the implants displayed no or mild bleeding on probing. Horizontal bone remodeling was not significant from baseline to 1 year at any levels. Finally, soft tissue profile was stable in the most cervical area while minor changes occurred during the first 6 months below the gingival margin. The absence of mid‐buccal recession (0.07 mm) and good PES were found after 1 year. Conclusion: Despite its limitations, this study showed that immediate implants in the posterior region using the SSA + PISF protocol resulted in promising implant outcomes with limited hard and soft tissue dimensional changes while decreasing the overall treatment time.