Validation of Spanish version of the human papilloma virus impact profile (HIP). (2nd April 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Henao, Alexandra Restrepo; Gómez, Nilton Edu Montoya; Gonzalez-Gómez, Difariney; Garcés-Palacio, Isabel C.
• Is Part Of: Current medical research and opinion. Volume 36:Number 4(2020)
• Page Start: 705
• Page End: 712
• Publication Date: 2020-04-02
• Subjects: Human papillomavirus -- validation -- psychosocial impact -- HIP; Clinical medicine -- Periodicals; Therapeutics -- Periodicals; 615.5
• DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2020.1729709
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0300-7995

Abstract

Abstract: Objective: To examine the construct validity and reliability of the Spanish version of the HPV Impact Profile scale (HIP) among women in Medellin, Colombia. Methods: We conducted a nested analysis of data from the pragmatic randomized controlled trial "Evaluation of Strategies for Optimal Clinical Management of Women with Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance" (ASCUS-COL; NCT02067468). Women with Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance (ASCUS) were randomly assigned to one of three triage strategies (Pap smear, colposcopy, HPV). Participants completed a questionnaire with sociodemographic information and the HIP scale translated into Spanish at baseline, two weeks after receiving triage test results, and one year after the second questionnaire. We conducted exploratory and confirmatory factorial analysis, and then assessed test reliability using Cronbach's alpha. Subsequently, we conducted multigroup confirmatory factor analysis to assess differences according to women´s age, and configurational invariance of the factor structure over the three time measures. Results: The sample consisted of 675 women, with a mean age of 40 years. The exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis for the HIP showed a seven-factor structure with appropriate adjustment indicators ( χ d f = 317 2 = 1466.783, p < .0001). Only two items (1 and 10) had low factor loads and were removed from the confirmatory analysis. Multigroup analysis according to women's age showed acceptable goodness of fit (RMSEA = 0.037, CFI/TLI:0.998/0.998). The factor structure was similar among the tree measures and the model preserved acceptable goodness of fit (RMSEA = 0.079, CFI:0.86). The Cronbach's alpha for the total score was 0.91, with the lowest score for sexual impact (0.49) and the highest score for worries and concerns (0.90). Conclusions: The Spanish version of the HIP had adequate reliability and construct validity, and its use could be considered in clinic and research settings.