The Importance of Extended High-Frequency Speech Information in the Recognition of Digits, Words, and Sentences in Quiet and Noise. Issue 3 (11th May 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Polspoel, Sigrid; Kramer, Sophia E.; van Dijk, Bas; Smits, Cas
• Is Part Of: Ear and hearing. Volume 43:Issue 3(2022)
• Page Start: 913
• Page End: 920
• Publication Date: 2022-05-11
• Subjects: Consonant–vowel–consonant words -- Digits-in-Noise -- Extended high frequency -- Sentences -- Speech recognition; Hearing disorders -- Periodicals; Audiology -- Periodicals; 612.85
• DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001142
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0196-0202

Abstract

Abstract : Objectives: In pure-tone audiometry, hearing thresholds are typically measured up to 8 kHz. Recent research has shown that extended high-frequency (EHF; frequencies >8 kHz) speech information improves speech recognition. However, it is unclear whether the EHF benefit is present for different types of speech material. This study assesses the added value of EHF information for speech recognition in noise for digit triplets, consonant–vowel–consonant (CVC) words, and sentences; and for speech recognition in quiet for CVC. Design: Twenty-four young adults with normal-hearing thresholds up to 16 kHz performed a listening experiment in quiet and in noise in a within-subject repeated measures design. Stimuli were presented monaurally. Steady state speech-shaped noise at a fixed signal to noise ratio was used for measurements in noise. Listening conditions varied only in terms of available EHF information. Stimuli were presented in three different conditions: (1) both speech and noise broadband, (2) speech broadband and noise low-pass filtered at 8 kHz, and (3) both speech and noise low-pass filtered at 8 kHz. In the speech-in-quiet experiment, stimuli (CVC) were high-pass filtered at 3 kHz and presented in two conditions: (1) with EHF information and (2) without EHF information. Results: In the speech-in-noise experiment, for all speech material, the highest scores were achieved in the condition where the noise was low-pass filtered at 8 kHz and speech unfiltered; the lowest scores were obtained in the condition where both speech and noise were low-pass filtered at 8 kHz. Adding speech frequencies above 8 kHz improved the median recognition scores by 75.0%, 21.8%, and 23.8% for digit triplets, words, and sentences, respectively, at a fixed signal to noise ratio. In the speech-in-quiet experiment, median recognition scores were 7.8% higher in the condition where the EHF information was available, as opposed to when it was not. Conclusions: Speech information for frequencies above 8 kHz contributes to speech recognition in noise. It also contributes to speech recognition in quiet when information below 3 kHz is absent. Our results suggest that EHFs may be relevant in challenging listening conditions and should be measured in pure-tone audiometry to get a complete picture of a person's hearing. Further, results of speech recognition tests may vary when different recording and/or measurement equipment is used with different frequency responses above 8 kHz.