3-D Geologic Controls of Hydrothermal Fluid Flow at Brady geothermal field, Nevada, USA. (July 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Siler, Drew L.; Pepin, Jeff D.
• Is Part Of: Geothermics. Volume 94(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-07
• Subjects: Geothermal -- Hydrothermal -- Principal component analysis -- Geologic structure -- Faults; Hydrogeology -- Periodicals; Geothermal resources -- Periodicals; Énergie géothermique -- Périodiques; GEOTHERMAL ENGINEERING; GEOTHERMAL ENERGY; GEOTHERMAL EXPLORATION; Geothermal resources; Hydrogeology; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 621.44
• DOI: 10.1016/j.geothermics.2021.102112
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0375-6505

Abstract

Highlights: Principal component analysis (PCA) reveals geologic controls on geothermal production PCA and 3D geology can distinguish productive from non-productive zones Production at Brady are controlled by stressed-loaded faults and structural stepover Abstract: In many hydrothermal systems, fracture permeability along faults provides pathways for groundwater to transport heat from depth. Faulting generates a range of deformation styles that cross-cut heterogeneous geology, resulting in complex patterns of permeability, porosity, and hydraulic conductivity. Vertical connectivity (a throughgoing network of permeable areas that allows advection of heat from depth to the shallow subsurface) is rare and is confined to relatively small volumes that have highly variable spatial distribution. This local compartmentalization of connectivity represents a significant challenge to understanding hydrothermal circulation and for exploring, developing, and managing hydrothermal resources. Here, we present an evaluation of the geologic characteristics that control this compartmentalization in hydrothermal systems through 3-D analysis of the Brady geothermal field in western Nevada. A published 3-D geologic map of the Brady area is used as a basis to develop structural and geological variables that are hypothesized to control or effect permeability or connectivity. The 3-D distribution of these variables is compared to the distribution of productive and non-productive fluid flow intervals along production wells and non-productive wells via principal component analysis (PCA). This comparison elucidates which geologic and structural variables are most closely associated with productive fluid flow intervals. Results indicate that production intervals at Brady are located: (1) within or near to known and stress-loaded macro-scale faults, and (2) in areas of high fault and fracture density.