Variations of High‐Latitude Geomagnetic Pulsation Frequencies: A Comparison of Time‐of‐Flight Estimates and IMAGE Magnetometer Observations. Issue 1 (29th January 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Sandhu, J. K.; Yeoman, T. K.; James, M. K.; Rae, I. J.; Fear, R. C.
• Is Part Of: Journal of geophysical research. Volume 123:Issue 1(2018)
• Page Start: 567
• Page End: 586
• Publication Date: 2018-01-29
• Subjects: field line resonances -- field line eigenfrequencies -- IMAGE -- time‐of‐flight -- mass density -- ULF waves; Magnetospheric physics -- Periodicals; Space environment -- Periodicals; Cosmic physics -- Periodicals; Planets -- Atmospheres -- Periodicals; Heliosphere (Astrophysics) -- Periodicals; Geophysics -- Periodicals; 523.01
• DOI: 10.1002/2017JA024434
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2169-9380

Abstract

Abstract: The fundamental eigenfrequencies of standing Alfvén waves on closed geomagnetic field lines are estimated for the region spanning 5.9≤ L < 9.5 over all MLT (Magnetic Local Time). The T96 magnetic field model and a realistic empirical plasma mass density model are employed using the time‐of‐flight approximation, refining previous calculations that assumed a relatively simplistic mass density model. An assessment of the implications of using different mass density models in the time‐of‐flight calculations is presented. The calculated frequencies exhibit dependences on field line footprint magnetic latitude and MLT, which are attributed to both magnetic field configuration and spatial variations in mass density. In order to assess the validity of the time‐of‐flight calculated frequencies, the estimates are compared to observations of FLR (Field Line Resonance) frequencies. Using IMAGE (International Monitor for Auroral Geomagnetic Effects) ground magnetometer observations obtained between 2001 and 2012, an automated FLR identification method is developed, based on the cross‐phase technique. The average FLR frequency is determined, including variations with footprint latitude and MLT, and compared to the time‐of‐flight analysis. The results show agreement in the latitudinal and local time dependences. Furthermore, with the use of the realistic mass density model in the time‐of‐flight calculations, closer agreement with the observed FLR frequencies is obtained. The study is limited by the latitudinal coverage of the IMAGE magnetometer array, and future work will aim to extend the ground magnetometer data used to include additional magnetometer arrays. Key Points: New estimates of fundamental FLR eigenfrequencies are obtained, improving upon previous work by using a more realistic mass density model The contribution of mass density to determining FLR eigenfrequencies, and the impact of using different mass density models, is assessed A new automated FLR identification method is applied to IMAGE ground magnetometer data, with the observed frequencies compared to estimates