General and custom deep learning autosegmentation models for organs in head and neck, abdomen, and male pelvis. Issue 3 (7th February 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Amjad, Asma; Xu, Jiaofeng; Thill, Dan; Lawton, Colleen; Hall, William; Awan, Musaddiq J.; Shukla, Monica; Erickson, Beth A.; Li, X. Allen
• Is Part Of: Medical physics. Volume 49:Issue 3(2022)
• Page Start: 1686
• Page End: 1700
• Publication Date: 2022-02-07
• Subjects: adaptive radiation therapy -- CT‐based autosegmentation -- deep learning -- radiation therapy planning; Medical physics -- Periodicals; Medical physics; Geneeskunde; Natuurkunde; Toepassingen; Biophysics; Periodicals; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 610.153
• DOI: 10.1002/mp.15507
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0094-2405

Abstract

Abstract: Purpose: To reduce workload and inconsistencies in organ segmentation for radiation treatment planning, we developed and evaluated general and custom autosegmentation models on computed tomography (CT) for three major tumor sites using a well‐established deep convolutional neural network (DCNN). Methods: Five CT‐based autosegmentation models for 42 organs at risk (OARs) in head and neck (HN), abdomen (ABD), and male pelvis (MP) were developed using a full three‐dimensional (3D) DCNN architecture. Two types of deep learning (DL) models were separately trained using either general diversified multi‐institutional datasets or custom well‐controlled single‐institution datasets. To improve segmentation accuracy, an adaptive spatial resolution approach for small and/or narrow OARs and a pseudo scan extension approach, when CT scan length is too short to cover entire organs, were implemented. The performance of the obtained models was evaluated based on accuracy and clinical applicability of the autosegmented contours using qualitative visual inspection and quantitative calculation of dice similarity coefficient (DSC), mean distance to agreement (MDA), and time efficiency. Results: The five DL autosegmentation models developed for the three anatomical sites were found to have high accuracy (DSC ranging from 0.8 to 0.98) for 74% OARs and marginally acceptable for 26% OARs. The custom models performed slightly better than the general models, even with smaller custom datasets used for the custom model training. The organ‐based approaches improved autosegmentation accuracy for small or complex organs (e.g., eye lens, optic nerves, inner ears, and bowels). Compared with traditional manual contouring times, the autosegmentation times, including subsequent manual editing, if necessary, were substantially reduced by 88% for MP, 80% for HN, and 65% for ABD models. Conclusions: The obtained autosegmentation models, incorporating organ‐based approaches, were found to be effective and accurate for most OARs in the male pelvis, head and neck, and abdomen. We have demonstrated that our multianatomical DL autosegmentation models are clinically useful for radiation treatment planning.