Adjustment of sex allocation to co‐foundress number and kinship under local mate competition: An inclusive‐fitness analysis. (18th November 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Gardner, Andy; Hardy, Ian C. W.
• Is Part Of: Journal of evolutionary biology. Volume 33:Number 12(2020)
• Page Start: 1806
• Page End: 1812
• Publication Date: 2020-11-18
• Subjects: foundress kinship -- local mate competition -- parasitoid -- sex ratio; Evolution (Biology) -- Periodicals; Biology -- Periodicals; 576.8
• DOI: 10.1111/jeb.13719
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1010-061X

Abstract

Abstract: Hamilton's theory of local mate competition (LMC) describes how competition between male relatives for mating opportunities favours a female‐biased parental investment. LMC theory has been extended in many ways to explore a range of genetic and life‐history influences on sex allocation strategies, including showing that increasing genetic homogeneity within mating groups should favour greater female bias. However, there has been no quantitative theoretical prediction as to how females should facultatively adjust their sex allocation in response to co‐foundress number and kinship. This shortfall has been highlighted recently by the finding that sex ratios produced by sub‐social parasitoid wasps in the family Bethylidae are affected by the number of co‐foundresses and by whether these are sisters or unrelated females. Here we close this gap in LMC theory by taking an inclusive‐fitness approach to derive explicit theoretical predictions for this scenario. We find that, in line with the recent empirical results, females should adopt a more female‐biased sex allocation when their co‐foundresses are less numerous and are their sisters. Our model appears to predict somewhat more female bias than is observed empirically; we discuss a number of possible model extensions that would improve realism and that would be expected to result in a closer quantitative fit with experimental data. Abstract : Sub‐social parasitoids are predicted to adjust their sex allocation behaviour when co‐foundresses are sisters.