Pan‐cancer analysis of prognostic metastatic phenotypes. Issue 1 (27th August 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Pan‐cancer analysis of prognostic metastatic phenotypes. Issue 1 (27th August 2021)
- Main Title:
- Pan‐cancer analysis of prognostic metastatic phenotypes
- Authors:
- Zaorsky, Nicholas G.
Wang, Xi
Garrett, Sara M.
Lehrer, Eric J.
Lin, Christine
DeGraff, David J.
Spratt, Daniel E.
Trifiletti, Daniel M.
Kishan, Amar U.
Showalter, Timothy N.
Park, Henry S.
Yang, Jonathan T.
Chinchilli, Vernon M.
Wang, Ming - Abstract:
- Abstract: Although cancer is highly heterogeneous, all metastatic cancer is considered American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Stage IV disease. The purpose of this project was to redefine staging of metastatic cancer. Internal validation of nationally representative patient data from the National Cancer Database (n = 461 357; 2010‐2013), and external validation using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database (n = 106 595; 2014‐2015) were assessed using the concordance index for evaluation of survival prediction. A Cox proportional hazards model was used for overall survival by considering identified phenotypes (latent classes) and other confounding variables. Latent class analysis was performed for phenotype identification, where Bayesian information criterion (BIC) and sample‐size‐adjusted BIC were used to select the optimal number of distinct clusters. Kappa coefficients assessed external cluster validation. Latent class analysis identified five metastatic phenotypes with differences in overall survival ( P < .0001): (Stage IVA) nearly exclusive bone‐only metastases (n = 59 049, 12.8%; median survival 12.7 months; common in lung, breast and prostate cancers); (IVB) predominant lung metastases (n = 62 491, 13.5%; 11.4 months; common in breast, stomach, kidney, ovary, uterus, thyroid, cervix and soft tissue cancers); (IVC) predominant liver/lung metastases (n = 130 014, 28.2%; 7.0 months; common in colorectum, pancreatic, lung, esophagus and stomachAbstract: Although cancer is highly heterogeneous, all metastatic cancer is considered American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Stage IV disease. The purpose of this project was to redefine staging of metastatic cancer. Internal validation of nationally representative patient data from the National Cancer Database (n = 461 357; 2010‐2013), and external validation using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database (n = 106 595; 2014‐2015) were assessed using the concordance index for evaluation of survival prediction. A Cox proportional hazards model was used for overall survival by considering identified phenotypes (latent classes) and other confounding variables. Latent class analysis was performed for phenotype identification, where Bayesian information criterion (BIC) and sample‐size‐adjusted BIC were used to select the optimal number of distinct clusters. Kappa coefficients assessed external cluster validation. Latent class analysis identified five metastatic phenotypes with differences in overall survival ( P < .0001): (Stage IVA) nearly exclusive bone‐only metastases (n = 59 049, 12.8%; median survival 12.7 months; common in lung, breast and prostate cancers); (IVB) predominant lung metastases (n = 62 491, 13.5%; 11.4 months; common in breast, stomach, kidney, ovary, uterus, thyroid, cervix and soft tissue cancers); (IVC) predominant liver/lung metastases (n = 130 014, 28.2%; 7.0 months; common in colorectum, pancreatic, lung, esophagus and stomach cancers); (IVD) bone/liver/lung metastases predominant over brain (n = 61 004, 13.2%; 5.9 months; common in lung and breast cancers); and (IVE) brain/lung metastases predominant over bone/liver (n = 148 799, 32.3%; 5.7 months; lung cancer and melanoma). Long‐term survivors were identified, particularly in Stages IVA‐B. A pan‐cancer nomogram model to predict survival (STARS: site, tumor, age, race, sex) was created, validated and provides 13% better prognostication than AJCC: 1‐month concordance index of 0.67 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.66‐0.67) vs 0.61 (95% CI: 0.60‐0.61). STARS is simple, uses easily accessible variables, better prognosticates survival outcomes and provides a platform to develop novel metastasis‐directed clinical trials. Abstract : What's new? Metastatic cancer is typically fatal, but survival can range from weeks to years. Currently, however, there is only one category of stage IV cancer; thus, prognostication is unreliable. To better reflect the heterogeneity of stage IV cancers, these authors created STARS, a pan‐cancer staging system. STARS stands for "Site, Tumor, Age, Race, Sex, " and for prognosis, STARS was more accurate than AJCC staging. STARS is relatively inexpensive, as it relies on readily available clinical data, making it accessible to communities worldwide. It also provides a platform for developing clinical trials for therapies against metastatic disease. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- International journal of cancer. Volume 150:Issue 1(2022)
- Journal:
- International journal of cancer
- Issue:
- Volume 150:Issue 1(2022)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 150, Issue 1 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 150
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0150-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- 132
- Page End:
- 141
- Publication Date:
- 2021-08-27
- Subjects:
- cancer -- death -- metastasis -- phenotype -- prediction
Cancer -- Periodicals
Cancer -- Prevention -- Periodicals
616.994 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0215 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1002/ijc.33744 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0020-7136
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4542.156000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 26175.xml